PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTEU vs. EWP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTEU vs. EWP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTEU achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly higher than EWP's 5.49% return. Over the past 10 years, PTEU has underperformed EWP with an annualized return of 4.25%, while EWP has yielded a comparatively higher 10.99% annualized return.


PTEU

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.65%
YTD
6.24%
6M
8.48%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
10.93%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
4.25%

EWP

1D
-1.06%
1M
3.64%
YTD
5.49%
6M
10.02%
1Y
34.73%
3Y*
30.89%
5Y*
17.03%
10Y*
10.99%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTEU vs. EWP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTEU
Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF
6.24%30.80%-0.50%12.45%-7.46%13.43%-19.41%13.50%-16.87%28.91%
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
5.49%78.03%5.70%30.26%-5.18%0.25%-3.94%11.93%-15.32%26.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PTEU and EWP is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.83

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.63

The correlation between PTEU and EWP shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.83 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTEU vs. EWP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTEU
EWP

Financial Services

25.1%
41.4%

Industrials

20.9%
16.1%

Technology

14.6%
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
4.0%

Utilities

7.1%
21.2%

Healthcare

5.7%
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%

-

Basic Materials

4.2%

-

Energy

4.0%
5.3%

Communication Services

3.6%
2.9%

Real Estate

1.2%
2.9%

Financial Services

PTEU
25.1%
EWP
41.4%

Industrials

PTEU
20.9%
EWP
16.1%

Technology

PTEU
14.6%
EWP
4.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PTEU
8.5%
EWP
4.0%

Utilities

PTEU
7.1%
EWP
21.2%

Healthcare

PTEU
5.7%
EWP
1.3%

Consumer Defensive

PTEU
5.1%
EWP

-

Basic Materials

PTEU
4.2%
EWP

-

Energy

PTEU
4.0%
EWP
5.3%

Communication Services

PTEU
3.6%
EWP
2.9%

Real Estate

PTEU
1.2%
EWP
2.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTEU vs. EWP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTEU
PTEU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PTEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTEU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PTEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EWP
EWP Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EWP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EWP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
EWP Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
EWP Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
EWP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTEU vs. EWP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTEUEWPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.33

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.07

-1.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.96

10.91

-5.95

PTEU vs. EWP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the EWP Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTEU and EWP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTEUEWPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.87

-0.78

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.85

-0.37

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.50

-0.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.31

-0.02

Drawdowns

PTEU vs. EWP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTEU drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, smaller than the maximum EWP drawdown of -61.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEU and EWP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTEUEWPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.45%

-61.19%

+25.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.82%

-11.38%

-1.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.04%

-12.19%

-2.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.04%

-33.91%

+18.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.45%

-46.36%

+10.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-2.60%

+0.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.50%

-21.43%

+6.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

3.19%

+0.50%

Volatility

PTEU vs. EWP - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) and iShares MSCI Spain ETF (EWP) have volatilities of 6.12% and 6.12%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTEUEWPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

6.12%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

15.64%

-1.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

18.76%

-1.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

20.24%

-5.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

22.23%

-7.65%

PTEU vs. EWP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTEU has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EWP's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTEU vs. EWP - Dividend Comparison

PTEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than EWP's 2.15% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EWP
iShares MSCI Spain ETF
2.15%2.27%4.35%2.70%3.07%3.29%2.56%3.72%3.69%2.72%4.65%3.85%
PTEU
Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF
1.81%1.92%3.49%2.74%0.69%1.55%0.00%3.43%1.86%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTEU and EWP have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EWP has higher volatility (6.12%) compared to PTEU (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTEU dropped -35.45% vs EWP's -61.19%.

On 10-year performance, EWP leads with 10.99% vs 4.25% for PTEU. On fees, EWP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EWP has performed better with a 10.99% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EWP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTEU.

EWP has the higher dividend yield at 2.15%, compared with 1.81% for PTEU.

PTEU tracks Pacer Trendpilot European Index, while EWP tracks MSCI Spain Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTEU and 0.50% for EWP.

EWP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.87 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTEU and EWP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer