PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTEU vs. EPOL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTEU vs. EPOL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) and iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTEU achieves a 6.24% return, which is significantly lower than EPOL's 13.58% return. Over the past 10 years, PTEU has underperformed EPOL with an annualized return of 4.25%, while EPOL has yielded a comparatively higher 11.45% annualized return.


PTEU

1D
-0.68%
1M
4.65%
YTD
6.24%
6M
8.48%
1Y
18.27%
3Y*
10.93%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
4.25%

EPOL

1D
-0.52%
1M
5.18%
YTD
13.58%
6M
22.93%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
35.67%
5Y*
15.78%
10Y*
11.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTEU vs. EPOL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PTEU
Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF
6.24%30.80%-0.50%12.45%-7.46%13.43%-19.41%13.50%-16.87%28.91%
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
13.58%77.34%-2.61%50.70%-24.62%12.21%-8.38%-6.13%-13.76%52.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PTEU and EPOL is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.50

The correlation between PTEU and EPOL shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (all time) to 0.65 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PTEU vs. EPOL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PTEU
EPOL

Financial Services

25.1%
45.6%

Industrials

20.9%
1.7%

Technology

14.6%
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
12.4%

Utilities

7.1%
5.1%

Healthcare

5.7%
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
5.5%

Basic Materials

4.2%
6.6%

Energy

4.0%
14.6%

Communication Services

3.6%
6.3%

Real Estate

1.2%

-

Financial Services

PTEU
25.1%
EPOL
45.6%

Industrials

PTEU
20.9%
EPOL
1.7%

Technology

PTEU
14.6%
EPOL
1.9%

Consumer Cyclical

PTEU
8.5%
EPOL
12.4%

Utilities

PTEU
7.1%
EPOL
5.1%

Healthcare

PTEU
5.7%
EPOL
0.3%

Consumer Defensive

PTEU
5.1%
EPOL
5.5%

Basic Materials

PTEU
4.2%
EPOL
6.6%

Energy

PTEU
4.0%
EPOL
14.6%

Communication Services

PTEU
3.6%
EPOL
6.3%

Real Estate

PTEU
1.2%
EPOL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTEU vs. EPOL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTEU
PTEU Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
PTEU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTEU Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTEU Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
PTEU Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTEU Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank

EPOL
EPOL Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
EPOL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPOL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPOL Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
EPOL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPOL Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTEU vs. EPOL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) and iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTEUEPOLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.09

1.76

-0.67

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.60

2.49

-0.88

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.29

-0.09

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.43

3.68

-2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.96

10.07

-5.11

PTEU vs. EPOL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTEU Sharpe Ratio is 1.09, which is lower than the EPOL Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTEU and EPOL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTEUEPOLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.09

1.76

-0.67

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

0.55

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.42

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.29

0.21

+0.08

Drawdowns

PTEU vs. EPOL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTEU drawdown since its inception was -35.45%, smaller than the maximum EPOL drawdown of -63.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTEU and EPOL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTEUEPOLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.45%

-63.72%

+28.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.82%

-11.04%

-1.78%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.04%

-21.81%

+6.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.04%

-54.21%

+39.17%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.45%

-61.41%

+25.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.71%

-1.65%

-0.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.50%

-26.89%

+12.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.69%

4.03%

-0.34%

Volatility

PTEU vs. EPOL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF (PTEU) is 6.12%, while iShares MSCI Poland ETF (EPOL) has a volatility of 7.84%. This indicates that PTEU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPOL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTEUEPOLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.12%

7.84%

-1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.00%

17.35%

-3.35%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.85%

23.20%

-6.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.23%

29.06%

-13.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.58%

27.65%

-13.07%

PTEU vs. EPOL - Expense Ratio Comparison

PTEU has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than EPOL's 0.61% expense ratio.


Dividends

PTEU vs. EPOL - Dividend Comparison

PTEU's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.81%, less than EPOL's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPOL
iShares MSCI Poland ETF
4.21%4.78%6.04%2.87%2.65%1.33%1.44%2.51%1.44%1.88%2.14%2.53%
PTEU
Pacer Trendpilot European Index ETF
1.81%1.92%3.49%2.74%0.69%1.55%0.00%3.43%1.86%0.60%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTEU and EPOL have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPOL has higher volatility (7.84%) compared to PTEU (6.12%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTEU dropped -35.45% vs EPOL's -63.72%.

On 10-year performance, EPOL leads with 11.45% vs 4.25% for PTEU. On fees, EPOL is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PTEU has been the lower-risk option at 6.12%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPOL has performed better with a 11.45% return vs 4.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

EPOL is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for PTEU.

EPOL has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.81% for PTEU.

PTEU tracks Pacer Trendpilot European Index, while EPOL tracks MSCI Poland Investable Market Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for PTEU and 0.61% for EPOL.

EPOL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTEU and EPOL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer