PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PTA vs. PCSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PTA vs. PCSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund (PTA) and Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PTA achieves a 4.21% return, which is significantly higher than PCSFX's 1.26% return.


PTA

1D
-1.42%
1M
-0.45%
YTD
4.21%
6M
3.91%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
2.81%
10Y*

PCSFX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.50%
YTD
1.26%
6M
1.95%
1Y
7.16%
3Y*
10.29%
5Y*
3.55%
10Y*
5.45%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PTA vs. PCSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PTA
Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund
4.21%9.04%15.82%11.58%-20.50%-0.95%4.53%
PCSFX
Principal Capital Securities Fund
1.26%8.96%12.15%6.82%-11.35%3.74%3.99%

Correlation

The correlation between PTA and PCSFX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.32

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2020

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PTA vs. PCSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PTA
PTA Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
PTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
PTA Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
PTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PTA Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank

PCSFX
PCSFX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
PCSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PCSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PCSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
PCSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
PCSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PTA vs. PCSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund (PTA) and Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PTAPCSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.92

-0.79

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.76

2.46

-1.70

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.05

11.10

-9.05

PTA vs. PCSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PTA Sharpe Ratio is 0.68, which is lower than the PCSFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PTA and PCSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PTAPCSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

3.44

-2.76

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

0.83

-0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

1.12

-0.88

Drawdowns

PTA vs. PCSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PTA drawdown since its inception was -28.71%, which is greater than PCSFX's maximum drawdown of -22.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PTA and PCSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PTAPCSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.71%

-22.42%

-6.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.49%

-2.97%

-6.52%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.03%

-2.97%

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.71%

-18.67%

-10.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.66%

-0.33%

-1.33%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.00%

-2.48%

-6.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.51%

0.66%

+2.85%

Volatility

PTA vs. PCSFX - Volatility Comparison

Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund (PTA) has a higher volatility of 3.65% compared to Principal Capital Securities Fund (PCSFX) at 0.68%. This indicates that PTA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PTAPCSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.65%

0.68%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.17%

1.87%

+6.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.57%

2.12%

+8.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.62%

4.28%

+10.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.06%

5.05%

+9.01%

Dividends

PTA vs. PCSFX - Dividend Comparison

PTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.27%, more than PCSFX's 5.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PCSFX
Principal Capital Securities Fund
5.68%5.80%5.50%5.75%5.68%4.57%4.88%5.43%6.07%5.14%5.08%5.78%
PTA
Cohen & Steers Tax-Advantaged Preferred Securities and Income Fund
8.27%8.33%8.37%8.93%8.83%7.10%0.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PTA and PCSFX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PTA has higher volatility (3.65%) compared to PCSFX (0.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PTA dropped -28.71% vs PCSFX's -22.42%.

PCSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.44 vs 0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PTA and PCSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer