PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSYPX vs. NUSFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSYPX vs. NUSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX) and Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (NUSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSYPX achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than NUSFX's 1.24% return. Over the past 10 years, PSYPX has outperformed NUSFX with an annualized return of 3.87%, while NUSFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.35% annualized return.


PSYPX

1D
0.10%
1M
0.49%
YTD
0.59%
6M
0.86%
1Y
3.57%
3Y*
4.84%
5Y*
3.33%
10Y*
3.87%

NUSFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.24%
6M
1.53%
1Y
4.27%
3Y*
4.59%
5Y*
2.74%
10Y*
2.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSYPX vs. NUSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSYPX
Palmer Square Income Plus Fund
0.59%3.88%5.40%7.40%-0.77%1.17%3.65%5.29%1.17%4.03%
NUSFX
Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund
1.24%4.27%5.22%5.21%-1.59%-0.17%2.34%3.68%1.51%1.53%

Correlation

The correlation between PSYPX and NUSFX is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.19

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2014

0.16

The correlation between PSYPX and NUSFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.28 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSYPX vs. NUSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSYPX
PSYPX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
PSYPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSYPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSYPX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
PSYPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSYPX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

NUSFX
NUSFX Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
NUSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NUSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
NUSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
NUSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
NUSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSYPX vs. NUSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX) and Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (NUSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSYPXNUSFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-7.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.60

3.55

-0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.94

11.18

-8.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.47

40.87

-27.40

PSYPX vs. NUSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSYPX Sharpe Ratio is 2.83, which is comparable to the NUSFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSYPX and NUSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSYPXNUSFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.83

3.14

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.86

2.09

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.91

1.94

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.52

1.78

-0.26

Drawdowns

PSYPX vs. NUSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSYPX drawdown since its inception was -11.43%, which is greater than NUSFX's maximum drawdown of -3.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSYPX and NUSFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSYPXNUSFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.43%

-3.88%

-7.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.38%

-0.39%

-0.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.77%

-0.87%

-0.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-3.15%

-3.35%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.43%

-3.88%

-7.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

0.00%

-0.10%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.71%

-0.24%

-0.47%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.11%

+0.17%

Volatility

PSYPX vs. NUSFX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Palmer Square Income Plus Fund (PSYPX) is 0.21%, while Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund (NUSFX) has a volatility of 0.49%. This indicates that PSYPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NUSFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSYPXNUSFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.21%

0.49%

-0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.26%

0.96%

+0.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.43%

1.38%

+0.05%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.84%

1.32%

+0.52%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.06%

1.22%

+0.84%

PSYPX vs. NUSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSYPX has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than NUSFX's 0.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSYPX vs. NUSFX - Dividend Comparison

PSYPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.31%, less than NUSFX's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NUSFX
Northern Ultra-Short Fixed Income Fund
4.18%3.78%4.09%2.86%0.97%0.71%1.52%2.42%2.09%1.42%1.07%0.85%
PSYPX
Palmer Square Income Plus Fund
3.31%3.33%4.16%4.05%3.23%1.27%2.08%3.11%2.84%2.53%4.26%3.25%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSYPX and NUSFX have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NUSFX has higher volatility (0.49%) compared to PSYPX (0.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSYPX dropped -11.43% vs NUSFX's -3.88%.

NUSFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.14 vs 2.83), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSYPX and NUSFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer