PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSTR vs. ARMW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSTR vs. ARMW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF (PSTR) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSTR achieves a 8.92% return, which is significantly lower than ARMW's 363.23% return.


PSTR

1D
-0.69%
1M
3.34%
YTD
8.92%
6M
9.55%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ARMW

1D
3.44%
1M
128.75%
YTD
363.23%
6M
245.13%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSTR vs. ARMW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
PSTR
PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF
8.92%1.82%
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
363.23%-40.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PSTR and ARMW is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2025

0.56

PSTR vs. ARMW - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSTR
ARMW

Technology

37.5%
36.0%

Healthcare

11.8%

-

Financial Services

9.7%

-

Communication Services

9.5%

-

Consumer Cyclical

7.6%

-

Industrials

7.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

6.1%

-

Energy

3.8%

-

Utilities

3.1%

-

Real Estate

1.9%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Technology

PSTR
37.5%
ARMW
36.0%

Healthcare

PSTR
11.8%
ARMW

-

Financial Services

PSTR
9.7%
ARMW

-

Communication Services

PSTR
9.5%
ARMW

-

Consumer Cyclical

PSTR
7.6%
ARMW

-

Industrials

PSTR
7.4%
ARMW

-

Consumer Defensive

PSTR
6.1%
ARMW

-

Energy

PSTR
3.8%
ARMW

-

Utilities

PSTR
3.1%
ARMW

-

Real Estate

PSTR
1.9%
ARMW

-

Basic Materials

PSTR
1.7%
ARMW

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSTR vs. ARMW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSTR
PSTR Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
PSTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSTR Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PSTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSTR Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMW
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSTR vs. ARMW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF (PSTR) and Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF (ARMW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSTRARMWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.34

PSTR vs. ARMW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSTRARMWDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.28

4.96

-3.67

Drawdowns

PSTR vs. ARMW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSTR drawdown since its inception was -14.73%, smaller than the maximum ARMW drawdown of -48.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSTR and ARMW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSTRARMWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.73%

-48.47%

+33.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

0.00%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-26.55%

+24.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

Volatility

PSTR vs. ARMW - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSTRARMWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.41%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.47%

88.46%

-79.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.51%

88.46%

-75.95%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.51%

88.46%

-75.95%

PSTR vs. ARMW - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSTR has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMW's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSTR vs. ARMW - Dividend Comparison

PSTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.67%, less than ARMW's 15.20% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ARMW
Roundhill ARM WeeklyPay ETF
15.20%16.38%0.00%
PSTR
PeakShares Sector Rotation ETF
4.67%4.96%1.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSTR and ARMW have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARMW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARMW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for PSTR.

ARMW has the higher dividend yield at 15.20%, compared with 4.67% for PSTR.

They also come from different issuers: PeakShares and Roundhill Investments. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for PSTR and 0.99% for ARMW.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSTR and ARMW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer