PSTIX vs. RYWWX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

PSTIX (PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund) and RYWWX (Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund) are both Inverse Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, PSTIX returned -10.52%/yr vs -27.73%/yr for RYWWX. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSTIX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.87%/yr for RYWWX.

Performance

PSTIX vs. RYWWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX) and Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund (RYWWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSTIX achieves a -6.03% return, which is significantly higher than RYWWX's -12.51% return. Over the past 10 years, PSTIX has outperformed RYWWX with an annualized return of -10.52%, while RYWWX has yielded a comparatively lower -27.73% annualized return.

PSTIX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: -6.03%
• 6M: -4.87%
• 1Y: -12.80%
• 3Y*: -9.79%
• 5Y*: -6.70%
• 10Y*: -10.52%

RYWWX

• 1D: -1.32%
• 1M: 0.83%
• YTD: -12.51%
• 6M: -12.04%
• 1Y: -39.75%
• 3Y*: -32.65%
• 5Y*: -19.39%
• 10Y*: -27.73%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSTIX vs. RYWWX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSTIX PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund	-6.03%	-8.24%	-11.28%	-11.01%	17.41%	-21.89%	-20.83%	-20.27%	5.21%	-14.04%
RYWWX Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund	-12.51%	-51.31%	-17.03%	-28.06%	2.55%	17.09%	-57.70%	-39.99%	23.02%	-47.98%

Correlation

The correlation between PSTIX and RYWWX is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.66
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.63
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.65
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.67
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.68

The correlation between PSTIX and RYWWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSTIX vs. RYWWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSTIX

PSTIX Risk / Return Rank: 0
PSTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
PSTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
PSTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 0
PSTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
PSTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 0

RYWWX

RYWWX Risk / Return Rank: 1
RYWWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
RYWWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
RYWWX Omega Ratio Rank: 1
RYWWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
RYWWX Martin Ratio Rank: 1

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSTIX vs. RYWWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX) and Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund (RYWWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSTIX	RYWWX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.13	-0.96	-0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.61	-1.37	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.83	0.84	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	-0.88	-0.03
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.73	-1.23	-0.50

PSTIX vs. RYWWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSTIX Sharpe Ratio is -1.13, which is comparable to the RYWWX Sharpe Ratio of -0.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSTIX and RYWWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSTIX vs. RYWWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSTIX drawdown since its inception was -90.52%, smaller than the maximum RYWWX drawdown of -98.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSTIX and RYWWX.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSTIX	RYWWX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.52%	-98.12%	+7.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.05%	-44.07%	+29.02%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.92%	-75.97%	+42.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-37.53%	-84.06%	+46.53%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-68.34%	-96.66%	+28.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-90.31%	-97.89%	+7.58%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-57.24%	-68.68%	+11.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	8.44%	33.55%	-25.11%

Volatility

PSTIX vs. RYWWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX) is 4.41%, while Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund (RYWWX) has a volatility of 14.51%. This indicates that PSTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RYWWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSTIX	RYWWX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.41%	14.51%	-10.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.46%	34.49%	-25.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.13%	42.55%	-30.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	48.04%	-31.50%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.54%	46.60%	-29.06%

PSTIX vs. RYWWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSTIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than RYWWX's 1.87% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSTIX vs. RYWWX - Dividend Comparison

PSTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.90%, less than RYWWX's 5.72% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PSTIX PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund	0.90%	0.00%	0.00%	4.09%	1.16%	0.68%	5.06%	1.23%	1.26%	1.68%	0.00%	3.57%
RYWWX Rydex Inverse Emerging Markets 2x Strategy Fund	5.72%	5.00%	5.36%	3.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSTIX and RYWWX in my portfolio?

PSTIX and RYWWX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSTIX or RYWWX?

RYWWX has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to PSTIX (4.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSTIX dropped -90.52% vs RYWWX's -98.12%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RYWWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.96 vs -1.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.