PSTIX vs. PFN
PSTIX (PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund) and PFN (PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II) are both mutual funds - PSTIX is a Inverse Equities fund managed by PIMCO, while PFN is a Multisector Bonds fund managed by PIMCO. Over the past 10 years, PSTIX returned -10.14%/yr vs 8.11%/yr for PFN. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. PSTIX charges 0.64%/yr vs 1.74%/yr for PFN.
Performance
PSTIX vs. PFN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSTIX achieves a -7.10% return, which is significantly lower than PFN's 1.01% return. Over the past 10 years, PSTIX has underperformed PFN with an annualized return of -10.14%, while PFN has yielded a comparatively higher 8.11% annualized return.
PSTIX
- 1D
- -0.33%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -5.52%
- YTD
- -7.10%
- 1Y
- -10.90%
- 3Y*
- -9.59%
- 5Y*
- -6.36%
- 10Y*
- -10.14%
PFN
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 4.73%
- 6M
- 0.47%
- YTD
- 1.01%
- 1Y
- 6.78%
- 3Y*
- 12.36%
- 5Y*
- 2.12%
- 10Y*
- 8.11%
PSTIX vs. PFN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSTIX PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund | -7.10% | -8.24% | -11.28% | -11.01% | 17.41% | -21.89% | -20.83% | -20.27% | 5.21% | -14.04% |
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II | 1.01% | 13.07% | 15.72% | 15.43% | -17.65% | 5.14% | 3.97% | 21.84% | 0.94% | 20.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSTIX and PFN is -0.34, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.35 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2004 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSTIX vs. PFN — Risk / Return Rank
PSTIX
PFN
PSTIX vs. PFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSTIX | PFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.13 | -0.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.70 | 0.63 | -1.34 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | 2.31 | -3.73 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSTIX vs. PFN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSTIX drawdown since its inception was -90.52%, which is greater than PFN's maximum drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSTIX and PFN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSTIX | PFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.52% | -80.08% | -10.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.05% | -10.77% | -4.28% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.92% | -14.31% | -19.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -37.53% | -33.45% | -4.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -67.42% | -45.70% | -21.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.42% | -0.25% | -90.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -57.32% | -11.78% | -45.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.39% | 2.95% | +4.44% |
Volatility
PSTIX vs. PFN - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund (PSTIX) has a higher volatility of 4.12% compared to PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) at 2.42%. This indicates that PSTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSTIX | PFN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.12% | 2.42% | +1.70% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.48% | 8.84% | +0.64% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.19% | 10.31% | +1.88% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.56% | 14.64% | +1.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.48% | 18.18% | -0.70% |
PSTIX vs. PFN - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSTIX has a 0.64% expense ratio, which is lower than PFN's 1.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSTIX vs. PFN - Dividend Comparison
PSTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%, less than PFN's 12.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PFN PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II | 12.20% | 11.49% | 11.57% | 11.92% | 12.19% | 9.71% | 9.67% | 9.07% | 10.81% | 9.20% | 10.12% | 11.74% |
PSTIX PIMCO StocksPLUS Short Fund | 0.91% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.09% | 1.16% | 0.68% | 5.06% | 1.23% | 1.26% | 1.68% | 0.00% | 3.57% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSTIX and PFN have a correlation of -0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSTIX has higher volatility (4.12%) compared to PFN (2.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSTIX dropped -90.52% vs PFN's -80.08%.
PFN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.66 vs -0.87), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSTIX and PFN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer