PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSRW.L vs. VWRL.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSRW.L vs. VWRL.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PSRW.L is traded in GBp, while VWRL.AS is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the VWRL.AS values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRW.L achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than VWRL.AS's 12.17% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with PSRW.L having a 13.16% annualized return and VWRL.AS not far ahead at 13.60%.


PSRW.L

1D
0.10%
1M
5.77%
YTD
15.72%
6M
17.26%
1Y
36.84%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
13.16%

VWRL.AS

1D
-0.42%
1M
6.27%
YTD
12.17%
6M
12.64%
1Y
30.41%
3Y*
18.22%
5Y*
12.47%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSRW.L vs. VWRL.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
15.72%19.97%12.95%10.09%2.42%22.39%2.67%17.83%-7.86%9.35%
VWRL.AS
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
12.17%14.20%19.87%15.71%-9.19%20.90%12.32%20.51%-3.73%13.60%

Correlation

The correlation between PSRW.L and VWRL.AS is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2013

0.84

The correlation between PSRW.L and VWRL.AS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSRW.L vs. VWRL.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSRW.L
PSRW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

VWRL.AS
VWRL.AS Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
VWRL.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VWRL.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
VWRL.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
VWRL.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
VWRL.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSRW.L vs. VWRL.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSRW.LVWRL.ASDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.85

2.81

+1.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.11

3.87

+1.24

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.53

+0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

4.27

+1.29

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.51

17.06

+4.45

PSRW.L vs. VWRL.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is higher than the VWRL.AS Sharpe Ratio of 2.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRW.L and VWRL.AS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSRW.LVWRL.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85

2.81

+1.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.92

+0.19

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.91

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.81

-0.23

Drawdowns

PSRW.L vs. VWRL.AS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRW.L drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, which is greater than VWRL.AS's maximum drawdown of -25.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRW.L and VWRL.AS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSRW.LVWRL.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.85%

-25.81%

-24.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-7.03%

+0.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-18.84%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

-18.84%

+4.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-25.81%

-3.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.42%

+0.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-3.45%

-0.89%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.77%

-0.06%

Volatility

PSRW.L vs. VWRL.AS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) is 2.70%, while Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF (VWRL.AS) has a volatility of 3.40%. This indicates that PSRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VWRL.AS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSRW.LVWRL.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

3.40%

-0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

7.88%

-0.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

10.68%

-1.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.16%

13.28%

-1.12%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

14.67%

-0.27%

PSRW.L vs. VWRL.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSRW.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than VWRL.AS's 0.22% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSRW.L vs. VWRL.AS - Dividend Comparison

PSRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, more than VWRL.AS's 1.24% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
1.74%2.00%2.29%2.46%2.58%1.96%1.99%2.45%2.52%2.03%1.93%2.00%
VWRL.AS
Vanguard FTSE All-World UCITS ETF
1.24%1.42%1.47%1.74%2.10%1.43%1.56%1.89%2.24%1.93%1.95%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSRW.L and VWRL.AS have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, VWRL.AS is cheaper at 0.22% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

VWRL.AS is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRW.L.

PSRW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while VWRL.AS tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRW.L and 0.22% for VWRL.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSRW.L and VWRL.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer