PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

PSRW.L is traded in GBp, while IWVG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the IWVG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRW.L achieves a 15.60% return, which is significantly lower than IWVG.L's 35.03% return.


PSRW.L

1D
0.68%
1M
5.66%
YTD
15.60%
6M
16.49%
1Y
37.59%
3Y*
19.30%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
13.15%

IWVG.L

1D
0.87%
1M
16.42%
YTD
35.03%
6M
36.54%
1Y
64.97%
3Y*
25.57%
5Y*
16.69%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
15.60%19.97%12.95%10.09%2.42%22.39%2.67%17.83%-7.16%
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
35.03%27.50%5.20%13.05%1.04%21.47%-6.83%14.46%-8.49%

Correlation

The correlation between PSRW.L and IWVG.L is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.86

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.91

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2018

0.92

The correlation between PSRW.L and IWVG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSRW.L
IWVG.L

Technology

19.1%
33.9%

Financial Services

18.8%
14.8%

Industrials

9.8%
11.3%

Energy

9.5%
3.8%

Healthcare

9.0%
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.5%
7.9%

Communication Services

7.5%
7.6%

Basic Materials

6.7%
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

5.7%
4.5%

Utilities

3.6%
2.5%

Real Estate

1.8%
1.8%

Technology

PSRW.L
19.1%
IWVG.L
33.9%

Financial Services

PSRW.L
18.8%
IWVG.L
14.8%

Industrials

PSRW.L
9.8%
IWVG.L
11.3%

Energy

PSRW.L
9.5%
IWVG.L
3.8%

Healthcare

PSRW.L
9.0%
IWVG.L
8.8%

Consumer Cyclical

PSRW.L
8.5%
IWVG.L
7.9%

Communication Services

PSRW.L
7.5%
IWVG.L
7.6%

Basic Materials

PSRW.L
6.7%
IWVG.L
3.0%

Consumer Defensive

PSRW.L
5.7%
IWVG.L
4.5%

Utilities

PSRW.L
3.6%
IWVG.L
2.5%

Real Estate

PSRW.L
1.8%
IWVG.L
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSRW.L
PSRW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

IWVG.L
IWVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9797
Omega Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSRW.LIWVG.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.92

4.84

-0.92

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.20

6.47

-1.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.75

1.91

-0.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

9.10

-3.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.48

33.81

-12.32

PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.92, which is comparable to the IWVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 4.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRW.L and IWVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSRW.LIWVG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.92

4.84

-0.92

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.11

1.28

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.74

-0.15

Drawdowns

PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRW.L drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, which is greater than IWVG.L's maximum drawdown of -28.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRW.L and IWVG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSRW.LIWVG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.85%

-28.07%

-21.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-7.02%

+0.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-13.79%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

-13.79%

-0.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-4.31%

-0.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

1.89%

-0.18%

Volatility

PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) is 2.70%, while iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IWVG.L) has a volatility of 5.62%. This indicates that PSRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IWVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSRW.LIWVG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

5.62%

-2.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.15%

10.93%

-3.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.55%

13.37%

-3.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.16%

13.07%

-0.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

15.57%

-1.17%

PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSRW.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than IWVG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSRW.L vs. IWVG.L - Dividend Comparison

PSRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while IWVG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWVG.L
iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
0.00%0.00%1.82%3.23%3.12%2.61%2.37%2.90%2.48%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
1.74%2.00%2.29%2.46%2.58%1.96%1.99%2.45%2.52%2.03%1.93%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSRW.L and IWVG.L have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IWVG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IWVG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRW.L.

Both ETFs track MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRW.L and 0.30% for IWVG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSRW.L and IWVG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer