PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L
PSRW.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF) and CAPU.L (Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust) are both exchange-traded funds - PSRW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while CAPU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, PSRW.L returned 13.16%/yr vs 14.28%/yr for CAPU.L. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSRW.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for CAPU.L.
Performance
PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSRW.L achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than CAPU.L's -1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, PSRW.L has underperformed CAPU.L with an annualized return of 13.16%, while CAPU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.28% annualized return.
PSRW.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 5.77%
- YTD
- 15.72%
- 6M
- 17.26%
- 1Y
- 36.84%
- 3Y*
- 19.34%
- 5Y*
- 13.56%
- 10Y*
- 13.16%
CAPU.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- -0.95%
- YTD
- -1.17%
- 6M
- -0.95%
- 1Y
- 6.50%
- 3Y*
- 9.20%
- 5Y*
- 9.55%
- 10Y*
- 14.28%
PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSRW.L Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF | 15.72% | 19.97% | 12.95% | 10.09% | 2.42% | 22.39% | 2.67% | 17.83% | -7.86% | 9.35% |
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust | -1.17% | 1.73% | 17.90% | 21.81% | -5.24% | 29.62% | 14.24% | 26.06% | 1.32% | 9.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSRW.L and CAPU.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.78 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015 | 0.81 |
The correlation between PSRW.L and CAPU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L — Risk / Return Rank
PSRW.L
CAPU.L
PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSRW.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.85 | 0.70 | +3.15 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.11 | 1.02 | +4.09 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.74 | 1.12 | +0.62 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.56 | 0.83 | +4.72 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 21.51 | 2.51 | +19.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSRW.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85 | 0.70 | +3.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.12 | 0.70 | +0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.91 | 0.92 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.58 | 0.89 | -0.31 |
Drawdowns
PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSRW.L drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, which is greater than CAPU.L's maximum drawdown of -26.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRW.L and CAPU.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSRW.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.85% | -26.39% | -23.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.60% | -7.76% | +1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.23% | -15.35% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.23% | -15.35% | +1.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.05% | -26.39% | -2.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -5.43% | +5.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.34% | -3.57% | -0.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.71% | 2.59% | -0.88% |
Volatility
PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) is 2.70%, while Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that PSRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSRW.L | CAPU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 3.07% | -0.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.14% | 7.04% | +0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.53% | 9.26% | +0.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.16% | 13.57% | -1.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.40% | 15.60% | -1.20% |
PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSRW.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Dividend Comparison
PSRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while CAPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CAPU.L Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSRW.L Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF | 1.74% | 2.00% | 2.29% | 2.46% | 2.58% | 1.96% | 1.99% | 2.45% | 2.52% | 2.03% | 1.93% | 2.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSRW.L and CAPU.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSRW.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSRW.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPU.L.
PSRW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CAPU.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. PSRW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while CAPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRW.L and 0.65% for CAPU.L.
Find the right allocation for PSRW.L and CAPU.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer