PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRW.L achieves a 15.72% return, which is significantly higher than CAPU.L's -1.17% return. Over the past 10 years, PSRW.L has underperformed CAPU.L with an annualized return of 13.16%, while CAPU.L has yielded a comparatively higher 14.28% annualized return.


PSRW.L

1D
0.10%
1M
5.77%
YTD
15.72%
6M
17.26%
1Y
36.84%
3Y*
19.34%
5Y*
13.56%
10Y*
13.16%

CAPU.L

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.95%
YTD
-1.17%
6M
-0.95%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
9.20%
5Y*
9.55%
10Y*
14.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
15.72%19.97%12.95%10.09%2.42%22.39%2.67%17.83%-7.86%9.35%
CAPU.L
Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust
-1.17%1.73%17.90%21.81%-5.24%29.62%14.24%26.06%1.32%9.38%

Correlation

The correlation between PSRW.L and CAPU.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 22, 2015

0.81

The correlation between PSRW.L and CAPU.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.68 (1 year) to 0.83 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSRW.L
PSRW.L Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSRW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

CAPU.L
CAPU.L Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
CAPU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) and Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSRW.LCAPU.LDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.85

0.70

+3.15

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.11

1.02

+4.09

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.74

1.12

+0.62

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

5.56

0.83

+4.72

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

21.51

2.51

+19.00

PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSRW.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.85, which is higher than the CAPU.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.70. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRW.L and CAPU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSRW.LCAPU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.85

0.70

+3.15

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.12

0.70

+0.41

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.92

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.89

-0.31

Drawdowns

PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRW.L drawdown since its inception was -49.85%, which is greater than CAPU.L's maximum drawdown of -26.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRW.L and CAPU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSRW.LCAPU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.85%

-26.39%

-23.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.60%

-7.76%

+1.16%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.23%

-15.35%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.23%

-15.35%

+1.12%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.05%

-26.39%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.43%

+5.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.34%

-3.57%

-0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.71%

2.59%

-0.88%

Volatility

PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF (PSRW.L) is 2.70%, while Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust (CAPU.L) has a volatility of 3.07%. This indicates that PSRW.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CAPU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSRW.LCAPU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.70%

3.07%

-0.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.14%

7.04%

+0.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.53%

9.26%

+0.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.16%

13.57%

-1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.40%

15.60%

-1.20%

PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSRW.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is lower than CAPU.L's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSRW.L vs. CAPU.L - Dividend Comparison

PSRW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.74%, while CAPU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CAPU.L
Ossiam Lux - Ossiam Shiller Barclays CAPE US Sector Value Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSRW.L
Invesco FTSE RAFI All World 3000 UCITS ETF
1.74%2.00%2.29%2.46%2.58%1.96%1.99%2.45%2.52%2.03%1.93%2.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSRW.L and CAPU.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PSRW.L is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSRW.L is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CAPU.L.

PSRW.L is categorized as Global Equities, while CAPU.L is Large Cap Blend Equities. PSRW.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD, while CAPU.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Natixis. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRW.L and 0.65% for CAPU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSRW.L and CAPU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer