PSRF.L vs. SPEQ.L
PSRF.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF) and SPEQ.L (Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - PSRF.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while SPEQ.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSRF.L returned 13.10%/yr vs 9.33%/yr for SPEQ.L. A 0.78 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSRF.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SPEQ.L.
Performance
PSRF.L vs. SPEQ.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PSRF.L is traded in GBp, while SPEQ.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPEQ.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSRF.L achieves a 15.01% return, which is significantly higher than SPEQ.L's 9.40% return.
PSRF.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 15.01%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
SPEQ.L
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 4.24%
- YTD
- 9.40%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 20.83%
- 3Y*
- 12.26%
- 5Y*
- 9.33%
- 10Y*
- —
PSRF.L vs. SPEQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF | 15.01% | 8.58% | 18.11% | 9.53% | 2.89% | 14.09% |
SPEQ.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc | 9.40% | 3.57% | 14.19% | 7.75% | -0.69% | 26.82% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSRF.L and SPEQ.L is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 14, 2021 | 0.78 |
The correlation between PSRF.L and SPEQ.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSRF.L vs. SPEQ.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Financial Services
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Healthcare
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Communication Services
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Energy
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Consumer Cyclical
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Industrials
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Consumer Defensive
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Basic Materials
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Utilities
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Real Estate
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSRF.L vs. SPEQ.L — Risk / Return Rank
PSRF.L
SPEQ.L
PSRF.L vs. SPEQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) and Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSRF.L | SPEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.34 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.20 | 3.61 | +3.60 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.49 | 11.59 | +14.90 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSRF.L | SPEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54 | 1.87 | +1.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | 0.65 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 0.78 | +0.04 |
Drawdowns
PSRF.L vs. SPEQ.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSRF.L drawdown since its inception was -38.37%, which is greater than SPEQ.L's maximum drawdown of -20.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRF.L and SPEQ.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSRF.L | SPEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.37% | -20.28% | -18.09% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -5.75% | +1.15% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | -20.28% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | -20.28% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -4.40% | +0.25% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 1.79% | -0.54% |
Volatility
PSRF.L vs. SPEQ.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) is 2.14%, while Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc (SPEQ.L) has a volatility of 2.77%. This indicates that PSRF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPEQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSRF.L | SPEQ.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 2.77% | -0.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.28% | 7.98% | -1.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.41% | 11.13% | -1.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 16.08% | -2.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 16.89% | -1.10% |
PSRF.L vs. SPEQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSRF.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than SPEQ.L's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSRF.L vs. SPEQ.L - Dividend Comparison
PSRF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, while SPEQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF | 1.20% | 1.37% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 1.70% | 1.29% | 1.78% | 1.67% | 1.78% | 1.60% | 1.51% | 1.64% |
SPEQ.L Invesco S&P 500 Equal Weight UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSRF.L and SPEQ.L have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPEQ.L is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPEQ.L is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRF.L.
PSRF.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while SPEQ.L is S&P 500. PSRF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while SPEQ.L tracks S&P 500 Equal Weight Net Total Return. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRF.L and 0.20% for SPEQ.L.
Find the right allocation for PSRF.L and SPEQ.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer