PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSRF.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF) and PQVG.L (Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSRF.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while PQVG.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSRF.L returned 13.10%/yr vs 16.59%/yr for PQVG.L. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSRF.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PQVG.L.

Performance

PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRF.L achieves a 15.01% return, which is significantly lower than PQVG.L's 16.37% return.

PSRF.L

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 5.05%
• YTD: 15.01%
• 6M: 15.37%
• 1Y: 33.26%
• 3Y*: 17.75%
• 5Y*: 13.10%
• 10Y*: 14.09%

PQVG.L

• 1D: 0.66%
• 1M: 5.52%
• YTD: 16.37%
• 6M: 16.32%
• 1Y: 23.87%
• 3Y*: 21.43%
• 5Y*: 16.59%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF	15.01%	8.58%	18.11%	9.53%	2.89%	32.90%	3.20%	22.49%	-4.27%	8.64%
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	16.37%	5.84%	32.29%	0.98%	12.54%	27.78%	4.44%	21.16%	-1.98%	14.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PSRF.L and PQVG.L is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.83
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 24, 2017	0.85

The correlation between PSRF.L and PQVG.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.85 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSRF.L	PQVG.L
Technology	21.4%	24.3%
Financial Services	15.5%	21.8%
Healthcare	12.1%	9.5%
Communication Services	10.9%	10.4%
Energy	8.7%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.4%	4.3%
Industrials	8.1%	15.6%
Consumer Defensive	6.5%	5.6%
Basic Materials	3.4%	2.2%
Utilities	3.2%	0.8%
Real Estate	1.8%	-

Return for Risk

PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSRF.L

PSRF.L Risk / Return Rank: 94
PSRF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 93
PSRF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
PSRF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 93
PSRF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
PSRF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 94

PQVG.L

PQVG.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PQVG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
PQVG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 67
PQVG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
PQVG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) and Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSRF.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.54	2.29	+1.25
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.81	3.27	+1.54
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.66	1.40	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	7.20	5.78	+1.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	26.49	17.38	+9.11
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSRF.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the PQVG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRF.L and PQVG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSRF.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.54	2.29	+1.25
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99	1.12	-0.13
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.90	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.82	0.89	-0.07

Drawdowns

PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRF.L drawdown since its inception was -38.37%, which is greater than PQVG.L's maximum drawdown of -25.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRF.L and PQVG.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSRF.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.37%	-25.88%	-12.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-4.11%	-0.49%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.14%	-17.44%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.14%	-17.44%	-0.70%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.79%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.24%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.15%	-4.17%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.25%	1.37%	-0.12%

Volatility

PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) is 2.14%, while Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF (PQVG.L) has a volatility of 2.80%. This indicates that PSRF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PQVG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSRF.L	PQVG.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.14%	2.80%	-0.66%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.28%	7.88%	-1.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.41%	10.40%	-0.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	14.89%	-1.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.79%	16.25%	-0.46%

PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSRF.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than PQVG.L's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSRF.L vs. PQVG.L - Dividend Comparison

PSRF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, more than PQVG.L's 0.78% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
PQVG.L Invesco S&P 500 QVM UCITS ETF	0.78%	0.82%	0.82%	1.61%	1.77%	0.87%	1.59%	1.41%	1.30%	0.72%	0.00%	0.00%
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF	1.20%	1.37%	1.46%	1.59%	1.70%	1.29%	1.78%	1.67%	1.78%	1.60%	1.51%	1.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSRF.L and PQVG.L in my portfolio?

PSRF.L and PQVG.L have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PSRF.L or PQVG.L?

On fees, PQVG.L is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSRF.L or PQVG.L?

PQVG.L is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRF.L.

What is the main difference between PSRF.L and PQVG.L?

PSRF.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while PQVG.L is S&P 500. PSRF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while PQVG.L tracks S&P 500 Quality, Value, and Momentum Multi-Factor Index (Net Total Return). Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRF.L and 0.35% for PQVG.L.