PSRF.L vs. FWRA.L
PSRF.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF) and FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both exchange-traded funds - PSRF.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while FWRA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-World Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PSRF.L returned 33.26% vs 30.60% for FWRA.L. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSRF.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRA.L.
Performance
PSRF.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
PSRF.L is traded in GBp, while FWRA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the FWRA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSRF.L achieves a 15.01% return, which is significantly higher than FWRA.L's 12.15% return.
PSRF.L
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 5.05%
- YTD
- 15.01%
- 6M
- 15.37%
- 1Y
- 33.26%
- 3Y*
- 17.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.10%
- 10Y*
- 14.09%
FWRA.L
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- 5.71%
- YTD
- 12.15%
- 6M
- 12.76%
- 1Y
- 30.60%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSRF.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF | 15.01% | 8.58% | 18.11% | 8.86% |
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 12.15% | 13.65% | 20.13% | 8.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSRF.L and FWRA.L is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023 | 0.71 |
The correlation between PSRF.L and FWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.71 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSRF.L vs. FWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Technology
Financial Services
Healthcare
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Financial Services
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Healthcare
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Communication Services
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Energy
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Consumer Cyclical
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Industrials
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Consumer Defensive
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Basic Materials
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Utilities
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Real Estate
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSRF.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank
PSRF.L
FWRA.L
PSRF.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSRF.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.66 | 1.49 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.20 | 4.39 | +2.82 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 26.49 | 16.73 | +9.76 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSRF.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.54 | 2.57 | +0.97 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.99 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.90 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.44 | -0.62 |
Drawdowns
PSRF.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSRF.L drawdown since its inception was -38.37%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -17.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRF.L and FWRA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSRF.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.37% | -17.86% | -20.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.60% | -6.91% | +2.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -29.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.38% | +0.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.15% | -2.09% | -2.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.25% | 1.82% | -0.57% |
Volatility
PSRF.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) is 2.14%, while Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) has a volatility of 3.66%. This indicates that PSRF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSRF.L | FWRA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.14% | 3.66% | -1.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.28% | 9.29% | -3.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.41% | 11.81% | -2.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.32% | 12.94% | +0.38% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 12.94% | +2.85% |
PSRF.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSRF.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSRF.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison
PSRF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.20%, while FWRA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF | 1.20% | 1.37% | 1.46% | 1.59% | 1.70% | 1.29% | 1.78% | 1.67% | 1.78% | 1.60% | 1.51% | 1.64% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSRF.L and FWRA.L have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRF.L.
PSRF.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FWRA.L is Global Equities. PSRF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while FWRA.L tracks FTSE All-World Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRF.L and 0.15% for FWRA.L.
Find the right allocation for PSRF.L and FWRA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer