PSRF.L vs. FASA.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

PSRF.L (Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF) and FASA.L (Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - PSRF.L is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while FASA.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE All-Share ex Investment Trusts ESG Climate Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSRF.L returned 17.85%/yr vs 12.75%/yr for FASA.L. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSRF.L charges 0.39%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for FASA.L.

Performance

PSRF.L vs. FASA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) and Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (FASA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSRF.L achieves a 16.69% return, which is significantly higher than FASA.L's 4.29% return.

PSRF.L

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 0.38%
• 6M: 12.62%
• YTD: 16.69%
• 1Y: 28.21%
• 3Y*: 17.85%
• 5Y*: 13.27%
• 10Y*: 12.72%

FASA.L

• 1D: 0.23%
• 1M: 0.95%
• 6M: 2.56%
• YTD: 4.29%
• 1Y: 14.66%
• 3Y*: 12.75%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSRF.L vs. FASA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF	16.69%	8.58%	18.11%	9.53%	2.89%	5.77%
FASA.L Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)	4.29%	21.28%	9.36%	4.57%	-2.43%	3.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PSRF.L and FASA.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.46
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2021	0.55

The correlation between PSRF.L and FASA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.46 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSRF.L vs. FASA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSRF.L

PSRF.L Risk / Return Rank: 95
PSRF.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PSRF.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
PSRF.L Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PSRF.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
PSRF.L Martin Ratio Rank: 95

FASA.L

FASA.L Risk / Return Rank: 45
FASA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
FASA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
FASA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 50
FASA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 36
FASA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSRF.L vs. FASA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) and Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (FASA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PSRF.L	FASA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.11	1.33	+1.78
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.20	1.88	+2.32
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	1.24	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.11	1.43	+4.68
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	22.23	4.47	+17.75

PSRF.L vs. FASA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSRF.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.11, which is higher than the FASA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSRF.L and FASA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

PSRF.L vs. FASA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSRF.L drawdown since its inception was -69.49%, which is greater than FASA.L's maximum drawdown of -12.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSRF.L and FASA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSRF.L	FASA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-69.49%	-12.64%	-56.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.60%	-10.95%	+6.35%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.14%	-12.35%	-5.79%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-18.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-29.80%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.81%	-2.45%	+1.64%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.51%	-3.12%	-11.39%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.27%	3.50%	-2.23%

Volatility

PSRF.L vs. FASA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF (PSRF.L) is 1.81%, while Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc) (FASA.L) has a volatility of 3.42%. This indicates that PSRF.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FASA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSRF.L	FASA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.81%	3.42%	-1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.41%	9.94%	-3.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.16%	11.79%	-2.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.32%	13.10%	+0.22%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.40%	13.10%	+2.30%

PSRF.L vs. FASA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSRF.L has a 0.39% expense ratio, which is higher than FASA.L's 0.12% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSRF.L vs. FASA.L - Dividend Comparison

PSRF.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, while FASA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FASA.L Invesco FTSE All Share Screened & Tilted UCITS ETF GBP (Acc)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PSRF.L Invesco FTSE RAFI US 1000 UCITS ETF	1.16%	1.37%	1.46%	1.59%	1.70%	1.29%	1.78%	1.67%	1.78%	1.60%	1.51%	1.65%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSRF.L and FASA.L in my portfolio?

PSRF.L and FASA.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PSRF.L or FASA.L?

On fees, FASA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSRF.L or FASA.L?

FASA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.39% for PSRF.L.

What is the main difference between PSRF.L and FASA.L?

PSRF.L is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while FASA.L is Europe Equities. PSRF.L tracks Russell 1000 Value TR USD, while FASA.L tracks FTSE All-Share ex Investment Trusts ESG Climate Select Index. Their fees differ too: 0.39% for PSRF.L and 0.12% for FASA.L.