PSQO vs. BLUI
PSQO (Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF) and BLUI (Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. At a 0.17 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSQO charges 0.52%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for BLUI.
Performance
PSQO vs. BLUI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSQO achieves a 1.80% return, which is significantly lower than BLUI's 3.46% return.
PSQO
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 1.80%
- 6M
- 2.46%
- 1Y
- 5.88%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLUI
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 0.02%
- YTD
- 3.46%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSQO vs. BLUI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF | 1.80% | 3.55% |
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF | 3.46% | 3.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSQO and BLUI is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2025 | 0.17 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSQO vs. BLUI — Risk / Return Rank
PSQO
BLUI
PSQO vs. BLUI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF (PSQO) and Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF (BLUI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSQO | BLUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.84 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 6.67 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.90 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.81 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 36.37 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSQO | BLUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.19 | 2.03 | +1.16 |
Drawdowns
PSQO vs. BLUI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSQO drawdown since its inception was -0.76%, smaller than the maximum BLUI drawdown of -2.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSQO and BLUI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSQO | BLUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.76% | -2.43% | +1.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -0.66% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.24% | +0.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.11% | -0.37% | +0.26% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.16% | — | — |
Volatility
PSQO vs. BLUI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSQO | BLUI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.54% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.26% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.54% | 3.89% | -2.35% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.00% | 3.89% | -1.89% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.00% | 3.89% | -1.89% |
PSQO vs. BLUI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSQO has a 0.52% expense ratio, which is lower than BLUI's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSQO vs. BLUI - Dividend Comparison
PSQO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%, less than BLUI's 4.71% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BLUI Bluemonte Diversified Income ETF | 4.71% | 2.91% | 0.00% |
PSQO Palmer Square Credit Opportunities ETF | 4.12% | 4.45% | 1.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSQO and BLUI have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PSQO is cheaper at 0.52% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PSQO is cheaper with a 0.52% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for BLUI.
BLUI has the higher dividend yield at 4.71%, compared with 4.12% for PSQO.
They also come from different issuers: Palmer Square and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.52% for PSQO and 0.75% for BLUI.
Find the right allocation for PSQO and BLUI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer