PSNYW vs. MBGYY
PSNYW (Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW)) and MBGYY (Mercedes-Benz Group AG) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto Manufacturers industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 3 years, PSNYW returned -37.30%/yr vs -7.18%/yr for MBGYY. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSNYW achieves a -17.58% return, which is significantly higher than MBGYY's -21.34% return.
PSNYW
- 1D
- 133.34%
- 1M
- 89.53%
- 6M
- 36.01%
- YTD
- -17.58%
- 1Y
- 10.13%
- 3Y*
- -37.30%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBGYY
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -3.50%
- 6M
- -18.70%
- YTD
- -21.34%
- 1Y
- -7.92%
- 3Y*
- -7.18%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSNYW Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) | -17.58% | 53.86% | -42.50% | -78.57% | -26.32% |
MBGYY Mercedes-Benz Group AG | -21.34% | 38.11% | -13.59% | 13.78% | 16.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSNYW and MBGYY is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2022 | 0.10 |
The correlation between PSNYW and MBGYY shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.10 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PSNYW:
$369.72M
MBGYY:
$49.67B
PSNYW:
$2.55B
MBGYY:
€131.11B
PSNYW:
-$828.47M
MBGYY:
€21.32B
PSNYW:
-$417.20M
MBGYY:
€19.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSNYW vs. MBGYY — Risk / Return Rank
PSNYW
MBGYY
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) (PSNYW) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSNYW | MBGYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 0.98 | +0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.12 | -0.29 | +0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.16 | -0.70 | +0.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSNYW drawdown since its inception was -97.81%, which is greater than MBGYY's maximum drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSNYW and MBGYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSNYW | MBGYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.81% | -33.47% | -64.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -84.40% | -27.72% | -56.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.67% | -33.47% | -56.20% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.78% | -23.47% | -71.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -86.60% | -12.12% | -74.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 62.66% | 11.37% | +51.29% |
Volatility
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Volatility Comparison
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) (PSNYW) has a higher volatility of 89.23% compared to Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY) at 9.64%. This indicates that PSNYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBGYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSNYW | MBGYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 89.23% | 9.64% | +79.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 115.83% | 21.13% | +94.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 257.11% | 28.63% | +228.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 170.86% | 27.87% | +142.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 170.86% | 27.87% | +142.99% |
Dividends
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Dividend Comparison
PSNYW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MBGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MBGYY Mercedes-Benz Group AG | 7.82% | 6.95% | 10.45% | 8.24% |
PSNYW Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PSNYW and MBGYY have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSNYW has higher volatility (89.23%) compared to MBGYY (9.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSNYW dropped -97.81% vs MBGYY's -33.47%.
PSNYW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSNYW and MBGYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer