PSNYW vs. MBGYY

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) (PSNYW) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY).

Performance

PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) (PSNYW) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
PSNYW Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW)	-20.72%	53.86%	-42.50%	-78.57%	-21.68%
MBGYY Mercedes-Benz Group AG	-13.21%	38.11%	-13.59%	13.78%	12.68%

Fundamentals

Market Cap PSNYW : $10.68B MBGYY : $60.90B
EPS PSNYW : -$1.07 MBGYY : $1.31
PS Ratio PSNYW : 4.19 MBGYY : 0.45
Total Revenue (TTM) PSNYW : $2.55B MBGYY : $131.90B
Gross Profit (TTM) PSNYW : -$828.47M MBGYY : $22.28B
EBITDA (TTM) PSNYW : -$417.20M MBGYY : $5.59B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSNYW achieves a -20.72% return, which is significantly lower than MBGYY's -13.21% return.

PSNYW

• 1D: 0.50%
• 1M: 68.33%
• YTD: -20.72%
• 6M: -36.37%
• 1Y: -6.48%
• 3Y*: -41.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MBGYY

• 1D: 3.53%
• 1M: -12.00%
• YTD: -13.21%
• 6M: -2.93%
• 1Y: 13.23%
• 3Y*: 0.16%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

PSNYW vs. MBGYY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSNYW

PSNYW Risk / Return Rank: 52
PSNYW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
PSNYW Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PSNYW Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PSNYW Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
PSNYW Martin Ratio Rank: 39

MBGYY

MBGYY Risk / Return Rank: 55
MBGYY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
MBGYY Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
MBGYY Omega Ratio Rank: 50
MBGYY Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
MBGYY Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) (PSNYW) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSNYW	MBGYY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.03	0.44	-0.47
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.77	0.85	+0.91
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.10	+0.12
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.09	0.54	-0.63
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.15	1.68	-1.83
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSNYW Sharpe Ratio is -0.03, which is lower than the MBGYY Sharpe Ratio of 0.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSNYW and MBGYY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSNYW	MBGYY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.03	0.44	-0.47
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.33	0.31	-0.63

Correlation

The correlation between PSNYW and MBGYY is 0.12, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Dividend Comparison

PSNYW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MBGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.01%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
PSNYW Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW)	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MBGYY Mercedes-Benz Group AG	8.01%	6.95%	10.45%	8.24%

Drawdowns

PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSNYW drawdown since its inception was -96.88%, which is greater than MBGYY's maximum drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSNYW and MBGYY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSNYW	MBGYY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.88%	-33.47%	-63.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-81.56%	-19.10%	-62.46%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-93.94%	-15.56%	-78.38%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-82.97%	-11.71%	-71.26%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	46.86%	6.13%	+40.73%

Volatility

PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Volatility Comparison

Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) (PSNYW) has a higher volatility of 34.74% compared to Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY) at 7.53%. This indicates that PSNYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBGYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSNYW	MBGYY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	34.74%	7.53%	+27.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	100.70%	18.35%	+82.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	214.61%	30.30%	+184.31%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	160.61%	27.55%	+133.06%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	160.61%	27.55%	+133.06%

Financials

PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

PSNYW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) reported a gross profit of 10.20M and revenue of 711.30M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 1.4%.

MBGYY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mercedes-Benz Group AG reported a gross profit of 5.27B and revenue of 33.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.8%.

PSNYW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) reported an operating income of -547.80M and revenue of 711.30M, resulting in an operating margin of -77.0%.

MBGYY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mercedes-Benz Group AG reported an operating income of 2.63B and revenue of 33.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.9%.

PSNYW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) reported a net income of -596.54M and revenue of 711.30M, resulting in a net margin of -83.9%.

MBGYY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Mercedes-Benz Group AG reported a net income of 1.35B and revenue of 33.37B, resulting in a net margin of 4.1%.