PSNYW vs. MBGYY
PSNYW (Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW)) and MBGYY (Mercedes-Benz Group AG) are both stocks. Both operate in the Auto Manufacturers industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 3 years, PSNYW returned -48.99%/yr vs -3.91%/yr for MBGYY. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSNYW achieves a -60.75% return, which is significantly lower than MBGYY's -16.91% return.
PSNYW
- 1D
- -16.66%
- 1M
- -22.72%
- YTD
- -60.75%
- 6M
- -62.38%
- 1Y
- -44.44%
- 3Y*
- -48.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MBGYY
- 1D
- -3.72%
- 1M
- -7.31%
- YTD
- -16.91%
- 6M
- -18.31%
- 1Y
- -0.01%
- 3Y*
- -3.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSNYW Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) | -60.75% | 53.86% | -42.50% | -78.57% | -21.68% |
MBGYY Mercedes-Benz Group AG | -16.91% | 38.11% | -13.59% | 13.78% | 12.68% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSNYW and MBGYY is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 20, 2022 | 0.11 |
The correlation between PSNYW and MBGYY shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
PSNYW:
-$32.22
MBGYY:
$1.26
PSNYW:
0.07
MBGYY:
0.41
PSNYW:
$2.55B
MBGYY:
$131.11B
PSNYW:
-$828.47M
MBGYY:
$21.32B
PSNYW:
-$417.20M
MBGYY:
$19.81B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSNYW vs. MBGYY — Risk / Return Rank
PSNYW
MBGYY
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) (PSNYW) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSNYW | MBGYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.91 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.02 | +0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.54 | -0.00 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.79 | -0.00 | -0.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSNYW | MBGYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.20 | -0.00 | -0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.37 | 0.24 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSNYW drawdown since its inception was -97.00%, which is greater than MBGYY's maximum drawdown of -33.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSNYW and MBGYY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSNYW | MBGYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -97.00% | -33.47% | -63.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -82.27% | -19.17% | -63.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -89.17% | -33.47% | -55.70% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -97.00% | -19.17% | -77.83% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -83.57% | -11.80% | -71.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 56.50% | 8.32% | +48.18% |
Volatility
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Volatility Comparison
Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) (PSNYW) has a higher volatility of 26.70% compared to Mercedes-Benz Group AG (MBGYY) at 7.55%. This indicates that PSNYW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBGYY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSNYW | MBGYY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 26.70% | 7.55% | +19.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 94.72% | 19.25% | +75.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 218.82% | 27.65% | +191.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 158.91% | 27.64% | +131.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 158.91% | 27.64% | +131.27% |
Dividends
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Dividend Comparison
PSNYW has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MBGYY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.40%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
MBGYY Mercedes-Benz Group AG | 7.40% | 6.95% | 10.45% | 8.24% |
PSNYW Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
PSNYW vs. MBGYY - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Polestar Automotive Holding UK PLC Class C-1 ADS (ADW) and Mercedes-Benz Group AG. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
PSNYW and MBGYY have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSNYW has higher volatility (26.70%) compared to MBGYY (7.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSNYW dropped -97.00% vs MBGYY's -33.47%.
MBGYY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.00 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSNYW and MBGYY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer