PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSMD vs. XBAP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSMD vs. XBAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMD achieves a 5.98% return, which is significantly lower than XBAP's 8.69% return.


PSMD

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.95%
6M
4.94%
YTD
5.98%
1Y
12.56%
3Y*
11.84%
5Y*
9.18%
10Y*

XBAP

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.90%
6M
8.52%
YTD
8.69%
1Y
13.78%
3Y*
12.97%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSMD vs. XBAP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
5.98%11.45%12.78%17.46%-4.47%7.38%
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
8.69%13.38%11.55%20.53%-7.59%7.65%

Correlation

The correlation between PSMD and XBAP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 1, 2021

0.85

The correlation between PSMD and XBAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSMD vs. XBAP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSMD
XBAP

Technology

34.1%
39.1%

Financial Services

12.6%
10.9%

Communication Services

11.2%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.6%
9.9%

Healthcare

9.4%
8.3%

Industrials

8.0%
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

5.0%
4.5%

Energy

3.2%
3.1%

Utilities

2.3%
2.1%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.8%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.7%

Technology

PSMD
34.1%
XBAP
39.1%

Financial Services

PSMD
12.6%
XBAP
10.9%

Communication Services

PSMD
11.2%
XBAP
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

PSMD
10.6%
XBAP
9.9%

Healthcare

PSMD
9.4%
XBAP
8.3%

Industrials

PSMD
8.0%
XBAP
7.8%

Consumer Defensive

PSMD
5.0%
XBAP
4.5%

Energy

PSMD
3.2%
XBAP
3.1%

Utilities

PSMD
2.3%
XBAP
2.1%

Real Estate

PSMD
1.9%
XBAP
1.8%

Basic Materials

PSMD
1.8%
XBAP
1.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSMD vs. XBAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMD
PSMD Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XBAP
XBAP Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
XBAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAP Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAP Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMD vs. XBAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSMDXBAPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.98

-0.53

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.85

10.68

-7.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.78

58.19

-43.41

PSMD vs. XBAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMD Sharpe Ratio is 2.19, which is lower than the XBAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMD and XBAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSMD vs. XBAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMD drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, smaller than the maximum XBAP drawdown of -14.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMD and XBAP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSMDXBAPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-14.57%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.42%

-1.30%

-3.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.70%

-8.25%

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.96%

-14.57%

+2.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.28%

-0.28%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.64%

-1.72%

+0.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.85%

0.24%

+0.61%

Volatility

PSMD vs. XBAP - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) has a higher volatility of 1.95% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April (XBAP) at 1.25%. This indicates that PSMD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XBAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSMDXBAPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.95%

1.25%

+0.70%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.90%

2.99%

+1.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.76%

3.57%

+2.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.64%

9.98%

-1.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.44%

9.79%

-1.35%

PSMD vs. XBAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than XBAP's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSMD vs. XBAP - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSMD nor XBAP has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%
XBAP
Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated 9 Buffer ETF - April
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSMD and XBAP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSMD has higher volatility (1.95%) compared to XBAP (1.25%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSMD dropped -11.96% vs XBAP's -14.57%.

On 5-year performance, XBAP leads with 9.64% vs 9.18% for PSMD. On fees, PSMD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, XBAP has been the lower-risk option at 1.25%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XBAP has performed better with a 9.64% return vs 9.18%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSMD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XBAP.

PSMD and XBAP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSMD and 0.79% for XBAP.

XBAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.88 vs 2.19), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSMD and XBAP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer