PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSMD vs. QMAR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSMD vs. QMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSMD vs. QMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
-1.77%11.45%12.78%17.46%-4.47%8.20%
QMAR
FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March
1.87%10.89%16.11%35.47%-16.56%12.31%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMD achieves a -1.77% return, which is significantly lower than QMAR's 1.87% return.


PSMD

1D
1.56%
1M
-2.40%
YTD
-1.77%
6M
0.79%
1Y
11.20%
3Y*
11.24%
5Y*
8.15%
10Y*

QMAR

1D
2.41%
1M
0.75%
YTD
1.87%
6M
4.47%
1Y
18.84%
3Y*
14.87%
5Y*
10.44%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSMD vs. QMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSMD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than QMAR's 0.90% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

PSMD vs. QMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMD
PSMD Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
PSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

QMAR
QMAR Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
QMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
QMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMD vs. QMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) and FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSMDQMARDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.43

-0.31

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

2.27

-0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.46

-0.17

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

2.03

-0.51

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.66

14.07

-5.41

PSMD vs. QMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the QMAR Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMD and QMAR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSMDQMARDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.43

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

0.75

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.76

+0.26

Correlation

The correlation between PSMD and QMAR is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PSMD vs. QMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSMD nor QMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM20252024202320222021
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%
QMAR
FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

PSMD vs. QMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMD drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, smaller than the maximum QMAR drawdown of -19.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMD and QMAR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSMDQMARDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-19.83%

+7.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.51%

-9.23%

+1.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.96%

-19.83%

+7.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.89%

-0.88%

-2.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-3.40%

+1.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

1.33%

-0.01%

Volatility

PSMD vs. QMAR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) is 3.10%, while FT Cboe Vest Nasdaq-100 Buffer ETF - March (QMAR) has a volatility of 3.50%. This indicates that PSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSMDQMARDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.10%

3.50%

-0.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.39%

4.62%

-0.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.09%

13.25%

-3.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.60%

14.05%

-5.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.56%

14.03%

-5.47%