PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSMD vs. ACVF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

PSMD vs. ACVF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSMD vs. ACVF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
-1.59%11.45%12.78%17.46%-4.47%11.23%0.95%
ACVF
American Conservative Values ETF
-2.98%13.67%20.56%23.81%-15.74%28.84%1.58%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSMD achieves a -1.59% return, which is significantly higher than ACVF's -2.98% return.


PSMD

1D
0.19%
1M
-2.19%
YTD
-1.59%
6M
0.88%
1Y
11.08%
3Y*
11.31%
5Y*
8.19%
10Y*

ACVF

1D
0.50%
1M
-4.69%
YTD
-2.98%
6M
-2.93%
1Y
12.17%
3Y*
15.72%
5Y*
10.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


PSMD vs. ACVF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both PSMD and ACVF have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Return for Risk

PSMD vs. ACVF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSMD
PSMD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
PSMD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSMD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSMD Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
PSMD Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSMD Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank

ACVF
ACVF Risk / Return Rank: 4040
Overall Rank
ACVF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACVF Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACVF Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
ACVF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACVF Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSMD vs. ACVF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) and American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSMDACVFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.10

0.71

+0.39

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

1.13

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.17

+0.12

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.52

1.08

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.55

5.03

+3.52

PSMD vs. ACVF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSMD Sharpe Ratio is 1.10, which is higher than the ACVF Sharpe Ratio of 0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSMD and ACVF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSMDACVFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.10

0.71

+0.39

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.66

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.03

0.87

+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between PSMD and ACVF is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

PSMD vs. ACVF - Dividend Comparison

PSMD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACVF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%.


TTM202520242023202220212020
PSMD
Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.47%0.00%
ACVF
American Conservative Values ETF
0.61%0.59%0.59%0.82%0.93%0.61%0.23%

Drawdowns

PSMD vs. ACVF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSMD drawdown since its inception was -11.96%, smaller than the maximum ACVF drawdown of -24.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSMD and ACVF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


PSMDACVFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.96%

-24.39%

+12.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.51%

-11.53%

+4.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.96%

-24.39%

+12.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.70%

-5.02%

+2.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.71%

-4.87%

+3.16%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.33%

2.47%

-1.14%

Volatility

PSMD vs. ACVF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Moderate (December) ETF (PSMD) is 3.09%, while American Conservative Values ETF (ACVF) has a volatility of 4.95%. This indicates that PSMD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ACVF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


PSMDACVFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

4.95%

-1.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.40%

9.08%

-4.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.09%

17.11%

-7.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.60%

16.21%

-7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.56%

16.08%

-7.52%