PSLV vs. SLVO
PSLV (Sprott Physical Silver Trust) and SLVO (UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN) are both Silver funds - PSLV tracks the No Index (Physical Silver) while SLVO tracks the Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, PSLV returned 100.09% vs 62.53% for SLVO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSLV charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for SLVO.
Performance
PSLV vs. SLVO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSLV achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly lower than SLVO's 13.49% return.
PSLV
- 1D
- -2.76%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -1.78%
- 6M
- 18.46%
- 1Y
- 100.09%
- 3Y*
- 41.73%
- 5Y*
- 18.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.97%
SLVO
- 1D
- -1.17%
- 1M
- 4.05%
- YTD
- 13.49%
- 6M
- 17.86%
- 1Y
- 62.53%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSLV vs. SLVO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | -1.78% | 145.08% | -6.40% |
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN | 13.49% | 71.20% | 1.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSLV and SLVO is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2024 | 0.90 |
The correlation between PSLV and SLVO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSLV vs. SLVO — Risk / Return Rank
PSLV
SLVO
PSLV vs. SLVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSLV | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.44 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 3.65 | -1.17 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.50 | 15.01 | -9.50 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSLV | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.72 | 2.13 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.45 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.17 | 1.61 | -1.44 |
Drawdowns
PSLV vs. SLVO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSLV drawdown since its inception was -79.38%, which is greater than SLVO's maximum drawdown of -17.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLV and SLVO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSLV | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.38% | -17.23% | -62.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.65% | -17.23% | -23.42% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -40.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.65% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -36.11% | -3.22% | -32.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -3.13% | -55.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 18.25% | 4.18% | +14.07% |
Volatility
PSLV vs. SLVO - Volatility Comparison
Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a higher volatility of 16.57% compared to UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN (SLVO) at 6.39%. This indicates that PSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SLVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSLV | SLVO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.57% | 6.39% | +10.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 57.35% | 27.33% | +30.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 58.49% | 29.53% | +28.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 35.64% | 25.23% | +10.41% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 31.14% | 25.23% | +5.91% |
PSLV vs. SLVO - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSLV has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than SLVO's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSLV vs. SLVO - Dividend Comparison
PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SLVO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 46.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
PSLV Sprott Physical Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SLVO UBS ETRACS Silver Shares Covered Call ETN | 46.44% | 19.35% | 14.45% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSLV and SLVO have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PSLV has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to SLVO (6.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSLV dropped -79.38% vs SLVO's -17.23%.
On 1-year performance, PSLV leads with 100.09% vs 62.53% for SLVO. On fees, PSLV is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, SLVO has been the lower-risk option at 6.39%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, PSLV has performed better with a 100.09% return vs 62.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSLV is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for SLVO.
SLVO has the higher dividend yield at 46.44%, compared with 0.00% for PSLV.
PSLV tracks No Index (Physical Silver), while SLVO tracks Credit Suisse NASDAQ Silver FLOWS 106 Index. They also come from different issuers: Sprott and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for PSLV and 0.65% for SLVO.
SLVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSLV and SLVO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer