PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSLV vs. COPJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSLV vs. COPJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSLV achieves a -1.78% return, which is significantly lower than COPJ's 15.22% return.


PSLV

1D
-2.76%
1M
-1.61%
YTD
-1.78%
6M
18.46%
1Y
100.09%
3Y*
41.73%
5Y*
18.43%
10Y*
13.97%

COPJ

1D
-4.49%
1M
13.66%
YTD
15.22%
6M
30.03%
1Y
123.62%
3Y*
45.39%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSLV vs. COPJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
-1.78%145.08%19.43%1.25%
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
15.22%140.63%11.07%-5.30%

Correlation

The correlation between PSLV and COPJ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2023

0.55

The correlation between PSLV and COPJ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.55 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSLV vs. COPJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSLV
PSLV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
PSLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLV Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

COPJ
COPJ Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
COPJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COPJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
COPJ Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
COPJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
COPJ Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSLV vs. COPJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) and Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSLVCOPJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.44

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.48

3.85

-1.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.50

11.26

-5.76

PSLV vs. COPJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSLV Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the COPJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.95. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSLV and COPJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSLVCOPJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

2.95

-1.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.45

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.17

1.10

-0.93

Drawdowns

PSLV vs. COPJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSLV drawdown since its inception was -79.38%, which is greater than COPJ's maximum drawdown of -32.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLV and COPJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSLVCOPJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.38%

-32.28%

-47.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.65%

-32.28%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.65%

-32.28%

-8.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.65%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-36.11%

-11.93%

-24.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-58.15%

-11.86%

-46.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

18.25%

11.02%

+7.23%

Volatility

PSLV vs. COPJ - Volatility Comparison

Sprott Physical Silver Trust (PSLV) has a higher volatility of 16.57% compared to Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF (COPJ) at 15.44%. This indicates that PSLV's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COPJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSLVCOPJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.57%

15.44%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

57.35%

35.19%

+22.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

58.49%

42.16%

+16.33%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.64%

34.78%

+0.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

31.14%

34.78%

-3.64%

PSLV vs. COPJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSLV has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than COPJ's 0.78% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSLV vs. COPJ - Dividend Comparison

PSLV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while COPJ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.04%.


PositionTTM202520242023
COPJ
Sprott Junior Copper Miners ETF
10.04%11.57%11.64%2.48%
PSLV
Sprott Physical Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSLV and COPJ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLV has higher volatility (16.57%) compared to COPJ (15.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSLV dropped -79.38% vs COPJ's -32.28%.

On 3-year performance, COPJ leads with 45.39% vs 41.73% for PSLV. On fees, PSLV is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, COPJ has been the lower-risk option at 15.44%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, COPJ has performed better with a 45.39% return vs 41.73%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

PSLV is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.78% for COPJ.

COPJ has the higher dividend yield at 10.04%, compared with 0.00% for PSLV.

PSLV is categorized as Silver, while COPJ is Commodity Producers Equities. PSLV tracks No Index (Physical Silver), while COPJ tracks Nasdaq Sprott Junior Copper Miners Index. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for PSLV and 0.78% for COPJ.

COPJ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.95 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSLV and COPJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer