PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSLAX vs. PVCMX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSLAX vs. PVCMX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam Small Cap Value Fund (PSLAX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSLAX achieves a 14.44% return, which is significantly higher than PVCMX's 2.30% return.


PSLAX

1D
0.68%
1M
2.73%
YTD
14.44%
6M
14.26%
1Y
26.11%
3Y*
16.42%
5Y*
6.87%
10Y*
10.01%

PVCMX

1D
-0.24%
1M
0.57%
YTD
2.30%
6M
3.13%
1Y
5.64%
3Y*
5.42%
5Y*
4.28%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSLAX vs. PVCMX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
PSLAX
Putnam Small Cap Value Fund
14.44%5.26%6.19%23.54%-13.42%39.51%3.60%9.47%
PVCMX
Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class
2.30%4.45%4.24%9.47%3.17%3.72%19.13%1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between PSLAX and PVCMX is 0.76, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.69

The correlation between PSLAX and PVCMX shifts across timeframes, from 0.65 (5 years) to 0.76 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSLAX vs. PVCMX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSLAX
PSLAX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
PSLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
PSLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

PVCMX
PVCMX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
PVCMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PVCMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
PVCMX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
PVCMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
PVCMX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSLAX vs. PVCMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam Small Cap Value Fund (PSLAX) and Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSLAXPVCMXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.12

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.26

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

2.14

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.63

6.20

+1.42

PSLAX vs. PVCMX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSLAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.55, which is comparable to the PVCMX Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSLAX and PVCMX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSLAXPVCMXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.55

1.43

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

0.83

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.40

1.07

-0.67

Drawdowns

PSLAX vs. PVCMX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSLAX drawdown since its inception was -69.37%, which is greater than PVCMX's maximum drawdown of -7.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSLAX and PVCMX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSLAXPVCMXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-69.37%

-7.44%

-61.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.52%

-2.81%

-7.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.63%

-7.44%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.63%

-7.44%

-18.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-52.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.24%

+0.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.15%

-1.28%

-10.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.73%

0.97%

+2.76%

Volatility

PSLAX vs. PVCMX - Volatility Comparison

Putnam Small Cap Value Fund (PSLAX) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class (PVCMX) at 1.11%. This indicates that PSLAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PVCMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSLAXPVCMXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.02%

1.11%

+3.91%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.00%

2.76%

+9.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.34%

4.20%

+14.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.75%

5.21%

+16.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.61%

6.31%

+17.30%

PSLAX vs. PVCMX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSLAX has a 1.15% expense ratio, which is lower than PVCMX's 1.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSLAX vs. PVCMX - Dividend Comparison

PSLAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.95%, more than PVCMX's 4.69% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSLAX
Putnam Small Cap Value Fund
5.95%6.81%5.67%1.21%8.40%0.20%0.90%1.33%21.52%38.15%0.66%5.38%
PVCMX
Palm Valley Capital Fund Investor Class
4.69%4.80%6.95%4.84%2.30%1.98%2.70%0.71%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSLAX and PVCMX have a correlation of 0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSLAX has higher volatility (5.02%) compared to PVCMX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSLAX dropped -69.37% vs PVCMX's -7.44%.

PSLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.55 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSLAX and PVCMX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer