PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSIAX vs. FSUVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSIAX vs. FSUVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Fund Class A (PSIAX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with PSIAX having a 9.04% return and FSUVX slightly lower at 8.73%. Over the past 10 years, PSIAX has outperformed FSUVX with an annualized return of 15.75%, while FSUVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.13% annualized return.


PSIAX

1D
1.64%
1M
-0.60%
6M
7.54%
YTD
9.04%
1Y
20.07%
3Y*
19.77%
5Y*
10.58%
10Y*
15.75%
ALL TIME*
8.23%

FSUVX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.14%
6M
6.39%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
14.88%
3Y*
14.07%
5Y*
9.11%
10Y*
11.13%
ALL TIME*
11.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PSIAX vs. FSUVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSIAX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Fund Class A
9.04%17.27%28.56%25.69%-18.68%15.75%17.96%57.65%-5.24%21.27%
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
8.73%11.03%17.40%14.80%-10.93%21.51%9.86%27.73%1.35%17.68%

Correlation

The correlation between PSIAX and FSUVX is 0.65, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.85

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2015

0.87

Over the past year, the correlation between PSIAX and FSUVX has dropped to 0.65 - well below their long-term average of 0.87, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSIAX vs. FSUVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PSIAX
PSIAX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
PSIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
PSIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FSUVX
FSUVX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FSUVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSUVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSUVX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
FSUVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5353
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSUVX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PSIAX vs. FSUVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Fund Class A (PSIAX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSIAXFSUVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.27

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

1.87

+0.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.47

7.68

+0.80

PSIAX vs. FSUVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.38, which is comparable to the FSUVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSIAX and FSUVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSIAX vs. FSUVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSIAX drawdown since its inception was -55.50%, which is greater than FSUVX's maximum drawdown of -32.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSIAX and FSUVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSIAXFSUVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.50%

-32.41%

-23.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.97%

-7.28%

-1.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.81%

-11.55%

-7.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.76%

-19.48%

-11.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.79%

-32.41%

-1.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.19%

-0.68%

-1.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.68%

-3.25%

-8.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

1.77%

+0.33%

Volatility

PSIAX vs. FSUVX - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Fund Class A (PSIAX) and Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund (FSUVX) have volatilities of 3.42% and 3.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSIAXFSUVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.42%

3.36%

+0.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.07%

7.10%

+2.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

9.00%

+3.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.74%

13.00%

+4.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.61%

15.19%

+4.42%

PSIAX vs. FSUVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSIAX has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FSUVX's 0.11% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSIAX vs. FSUVX - Dividend Comparison

PSIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.73%, more than FSUVX's 4.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FSUVX
Fidelity SAI U.S. Low Volatility Index Fund
4.09%4.45%2.25%1.74%4.12%3.52%1.31%3.80%2.63%2.94%2.23%1.17%
PSIAX
PGIM Quant Solutions Large-Cap Index Fund Class A
7.73%8.43%7.63%13.35%16.13%0.86%28.04%34.42%23.26%6.01%3.61%3.55%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSIAX and FSUVX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSIAX has higher volatility (3.42%) compared to FSUVX (3.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSIAX dropped -55.50% vs FSUVX's -32.41%.

FSUVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSIAX and FSUVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer