PSH vs. PBFB

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB).

PSH and PBFB are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSH is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023. PBFB is an actively managed fund by PGIM. It was launched on Jan 31, 2024.

Performance

PSH vs. PBFB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

PSH vs. PBFB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF	0.41%	7.34%	7.40%
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February	-1.32%	9.86%	10.00%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSH achieves a 0.41% return, which is significantly higher than PBFB's -1.32% return.

PSH

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: 0.01%
• YTD: 0.41%
• 6M: 1.51%
• 1Y: 6.27%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PBFB

• 1D: 1.37%
• 1M: -1.73%
• YTD: -1.32%
• 6M: 1.11%
• 1Y: 10.42%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSH vs. PBFB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than PBFB's 0.50% expense ratio.

PBFB

PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February

PSH

PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF

Return for Risk

PSH vs. PBFB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSH

PSH Risk / Return Rank: 86
PSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PSH Omega Ratio Rank: 90
PSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
PSH Martin Ratio Rank: 87

PBFB

PBFB Risk / Return Rank: 74
PBFB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
PBFB Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
PBFB Omega Ratio Rank: 80
PBFB Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
PBFB Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSH vs. PBFB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSH	PBFB	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	1.26	+0.35
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	1.89	+0.53
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.32	+0.06
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.26	1.74	+0.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	10.56	9.60	+0.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSH vs. PBFB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSH Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the PBFB Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSH and PBFB, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSH	PBFB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.61	1.26	+0.35
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.16	1.31	+0.85

Correlation

The correlation between PSH and PBFB is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

PSH vs. PBFB - Dividend Comparison

PSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.61%, while PBFB has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF	7.61%	6.62%	8.35%
PBFB PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

PSH vs. PBFB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSH drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, smaller than the maximum PBFB drawdown of -8.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSH and PBFB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSH	PBFB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-8.65%	+5.59%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.84%	-6.16%	+3.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.30%	-2.47%	+2.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.27%	-0.63%	+0.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.61%	1.11%	-0.50%

Volatility

PSH vs. PBFB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) is 1.55%, while PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 20 ETF - February (PBFB) has a volatility of 2.54%. This indicates that PSH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PBFB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSH	PBFB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.55%	2.54%	-0.99%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	1.98%	3.80%	-1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.93%	8.31%	-4.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.30%	6.54%	-3.24%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.30%	6.54%	-3.24%