PSH vs. IBHG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSH (PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF) and IBHG (iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF) are both High Yield Bonds funds. PSH is actively managed, while IBHG is passively managed. Over the past year, PSH returned 6.11% vs 4.61% for IBHG. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSH charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for IBHG.

Performance

PSH vs. IBHG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSH achieves a 1.88% return, which is significantly higher than IBHG's 0.96% return.

PSH

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 0.08%
• YTD: 1.88%
• 6M: 2.38%
• 1Y: 6.11%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IBHG

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.96%
• 6M: 1.46%
• 1Y: 4.61%
• 3Y*: 7.37%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSH vs. IBHG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF	1.88%	7.34%	7.96%	0.38%
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF	0.96%	6.90%	7.42%	0.25%

Correlation

The correlation between PSH and IBHG is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 20, 2023	0.65

The correlation between PSH and IBHG shifts across timeframes, from 0.52 (1 year) to 0.65 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

PSH vs. IBHG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSH

PSH Risk / Return Rank: 71
PSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 60
PSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
PSH Omega Ratio Rank: 72
PSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PSH Martin Ratio Rank: 69

IBHG

IBHG Risk / Return Rank: 79
IBHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
IBHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
IBHG Omega Ratio Rank: 70
IBHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
IBHG Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSH vs. IBHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) and iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSH	IBHG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	2.20	-0.16
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.42	-0.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.42	+0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	6.38	-2.05
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.80	23.30	-10.50
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSH vs. IBHG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSH Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the IBHG Sharpe Ratio of 2.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSH and IBHG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSH	IBHG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	2.20	-0.16
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	2.21	0.56	+1.65

Drawdowns

PSH vs. IBHG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSH drawdown since its inception was -3.06%, smaller than the maximum IBHG drawdown of -13.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSH and IBHG.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSH	IBHG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-3.06%	-13.85%	+10.79%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-1.42%	-0.73%	-0.69%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-3.39%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.16%	-0.22%	+0.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.27%	-2.67%	+2.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.48%	0.20%	+0.28%

Volatility

PSH vs. IBHG - Volatility Comparison

PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF (PSH) has a higher volatility of 0.69% compared to iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF (IBHG) at 0.58%. This indicates that PSH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBHG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSH	IBHG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.69%	0.58%	+0.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.10%	1.53%	+0.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.02%	2.11%	+0.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	3.26%	6.37%	-3.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	3.26%	6.37%	-3.11%

PSH vs. IBHG - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSH has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than IBHG's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSH vs. IBHG - Dividend Comparison

PSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.66%, more than IBHG's 6.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
IBHG iShares iBonds 2027 Term High Yield and Income ETF	6.08%	6.33%	7.02%	6.66%	5.62%	2.13%
PSH PGIM Short Duration High Yield ETF	6.66%	6.62%	8.35%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSH and IBHG in my portfolio?

PSH and IBHG have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSH or IBHG?

PSH has higher volatility (0.69%) compared to IBHG (0.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSH dropped -3.06% vs IBHG's -13.85%.

Which ETF is better, PSH or IBHG?

On 1-year performance, PSH leads with 6.11% vs 4.61% for IBHG. On fees, IBHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, IBHG has been the lower-risk option at 0.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSH or IBHG?

Over the 1-year period, PSH has performed better with a 6.11% return vs 4.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSH or IBHG?

IBHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for PSH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSH or IBHG?

PSH has the higher dividend yield at 6.66%, compared with 6.08% for IBHG.

What is the main difference between PSH and IBHG?

They also come from different issuers: PGIM and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for PSH and 0.35% for IBHG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IBHG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.20 vs 2.04), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.