PSFM vs. INDS
PSFM (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF) and INDS (Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSFM is a Defined Outcome fund actively managed by Pacer, while INDS is a REIT fund tracking the Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR Index. PSFM is actively managed, while INDS is passively managed. Over the past 5 years, PSFM returned 10.00%/yr vs 0.82%/yr for INDS. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFM charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for INDS.
Performance
PSFM vs. INDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFM achieves a 9.21% return, which is significantly higher than INDS's 6.59% return.
PSFM
- 1D
- -0.16%
- 1M
- 1.92%
- YTD
- 9.21%
- 6M
- 10.00%
- 1Y
- 17.37%
- 3Y*
- 13.46%
- 5Y*
- 10.00%
- 10Y*
- —
INDS
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 6.59%
- 6M
- 5.24%
- 1Y
- 9.81%
- 3Y*
- 2.57%
- 5Y*
- 0.82%
- 10Y*
- —
PSFM vs. INDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFM Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF | 9.21% | 7.28% | 14.18% | 18.32% | -5.23% | 11.65% |
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 6.59% | 7.78% | -12.69% | 17.72% | -32.68% | 42.99% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFM and INDS is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.42 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 5, 2021 | 0.52 |
The correlation between PSFM and INDS shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
PSFM vs. INDS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSFM
INDS
Technology
-
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
PSFM
INDS
-
Financial Services
PSFM
INDS
-
Communication Services
PSFM
INDS
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSFM
INDS
-
Healthcare
PSFM
INDS
-
Industrials
PSFM
INDS
-
Consumer Defensive
PSFM
INDS
-
Energy
PSFM
INDS
-
Utilities
PSFM
INDS
-
Real Estate
PSFM
INDS
Basic Materials
PSFM
INDS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFM vs. INDS — Risk / Return Rank
PSFM
INDS
PSFM vs. INDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) and Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSFM | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.76 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +6.84 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 2.03 | 1.11 | +0.92 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 13.28 | 0.81 | +12.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 70.48 | 2.44 | +68.04 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSFM | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.37 | 0.61 | +3.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.95 | 0.04 | +0.91 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.00 | 0.38 | +0.62 |
Drawdowns
PSFM vs. INDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFM drawdown since its inception was -14.33%, smaller than the maximum INDS drawdown of -40.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFM and INDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFM | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.33% | -40.17% | +25.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.31% | -12.23% | +10.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -14.12% | -26.96% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.33% | -40.17% | +25.84% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -20.51% | +20.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.27% | -15.57% | +13.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.25% | 4.04% | -3.79% |
Volatility
PSFM vs. INDS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF (PSFM) is 0.86%, while Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF (INDS) has a volatility of 5.23%. This indicates that PSFM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INDS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFM | INDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.86% | 5.23% | -4.37% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.88% | 12.10% | -9.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.01% | 16.23% | -12.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.57% | 20.16% | -9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.51% | 23.11% | -12.60% |
PSFM vs. INDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSFM has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is higher than INDS's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSFM vs. INDS - Dividend Comparison
PSFM has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INDS Pacer Benchmark Industrial Real Estate SCTR ETF | 3.55% | 3.70% | 3.75% | 3.11% | 2.63% | 1.24% | 1.68% | 2.26% | 1.81% |
PSFM Pacer Swan SOS Flex (April) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFM and INDS have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
INDS has higher volatility (5.23%) compared to PSFM (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFM dropped -14.33% vs INDS's -40.17%.
On 5-year performance, PSFM leads with 10.00% vs 0.82% for INDS. On fees, INDS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSFM has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, PSFM has performed better with a 10.00% return vs 0.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
INDS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.61% for PSFM.
INDS has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 0.00% for PSFM.
PSFM is categorized as Defined Outcome, while INDS is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSFM and 0.60% for INDS.
PSFM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.37 vs 0.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSFM and INDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer