PSFD vs. TEXN

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

PSFD (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF) and TEXN (iShares Texas Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PSFD is actively managed, while TEXN is passively managed. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFD charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for TEXN.

Performance

PSFD vs. TEXN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFD achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly lower than TEXN's 26.24% return.

PSFD

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 2.33%
• YTD: 6.69%
• 6M: 7.90%
• 1Y: 18.41%
• 3Y*: 15.00%
• 5Y*: 11.94%
• 10Y*: —

TEXN

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: 6.02%
• YTD: 26.24%
• 6M: 26.97%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFD vs. TEXN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF	6.69%	8.94%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	26.24%	8.16%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFD and TEXN is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2025	0.54

PSFD vs. TEXN - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSFD	TEXN
Technology	36.2%	15.5%
Financial Services	11.9%	4.1%
Communication Services	10.9%	3.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	10.8%
Healthcare	8.4%	2.9%
Industrials	8.1%	16.9%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	2.1%
Energy	3.5%	36.1%
Utilities	2.3%	2.9%
Real Estate	1.9%	4.2%
Basic Materials	1.8%	0.8%

Return for Risk

PSFD vs. TEXN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFD

PSFD Risk / Return Rank: 80
PSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 88
PSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
PSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 81

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFD vs. TEXN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and iShares Texas Equity ETF (TEXN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSFD	TEXN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.72	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.01	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.57	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.20	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	16.43	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSFD	TEXN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.72	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.25	2.78	-1.53

Drawdowns

PSFD vs. TEXN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFD drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, which is greater than TEXN's maximum drawdown of -6.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFD and TEXN.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSFD	TEXN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.94%	-6.34%	-8.60%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.02%	-1.13%	-0.89%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PSFD	TEXN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.61%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.80%	14.22%	-7.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	14.22%	-3.74%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.43%	14.22%	-3.79%

PSFD vs. TEXN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than TEXN's 0.20% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSFD vs. TEXN - Dividend Comparison

PSFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TEXN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%.

Position	TTM	2025
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%
TEXN iShares Texas Equity ETF	1.01%	0.86%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSFD and TEXN in my portfolio?

PSFD and TEXN have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PSFD or TEXN?

On fees, TEXN is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSFD or TEXN?

TEXN is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSFD or TEXN?

TEXN has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.00% for PSFD.

What is the main difference between PSFD and TEXN?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFD and 0.20% for TEXN.