PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSFD vs. SRVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSFD vs. SRVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFD achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly lower than SRVR's 19.79% return.


PSFD

1D
0.00%
1M
2.33%
YTD
6.69%
6M
7.90%
1Y
18.41%
3Y*
15.00%
5Y*
11.94%
10Y*

SRVR

1D
-1.79%
1M
-2.74%
YTD
19.79%
6M
20.69%
1Y
11.19%
3Y*
8.85%
5Y*
-0.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFD vs. SRVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
PSFD
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF
6.69%12.93%14.54%20.95%-3.06%18.23%1.33%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
19.79%-1.99%2.70%6.84%-31.90%22.31%2.28%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFD and SRVR is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.51

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2020

0.59

The correlation between PSFD and SRVR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSFD vs. SRVR - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSFD
SRVR

Technology

36.2%
6.8%

Financial Services

11.9%
0.9%

Communication Services

10.9%
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%

-

Healthcare

8.4%

-

Industrials

8.1%
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%

-

Energy

3.5%
3.8%

Utilities

2.3%
2.2%

Real Estate

1.9%
66.4%

Basic Materials

1.8%
0.8%

Technology

PSFD
36.2%
SRVR
6.8%

Financial Services

PSFD
11.9%
SRVR
0.9%

Communication Services

PSFD
10.9%
SRVR
7.5%

Consumer Cyclical

PSFD
10.1%
SRVR

-

Healthcare

PSFD
8.4%
SRVR

-

Industrials

PSFD
8.1%
SRVR
11.7%

Consumer Defensive

PSFD
4.9%
SRVR

-

Energy

PSFD
3.5%
SRVR
3.8%

Utilities

PSFD
2.3%
SRVR
2.2%

Real Estate

PSFD
1.9%
SRVR
66.4%

Basic Materials

PSFD
1.8%
SRVR
0.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSFD vs. SRVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFD
PSFD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
PSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
PSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

SRVR
SRVR Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
SRVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SRVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
SRVR Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
SRVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
SRVR Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFD vs. SRVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSFDSRVRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.72

0.67

+2.05

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.01

1.05

+2.97

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.57

1.13

+0.44

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.20

0.76

+2.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

16.43

1.64

+14.78

PSFD vs. SRVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is higher than the SRVR Sharpe Ratio of 0.67. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFD and SRVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSFDSRVRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.72

0.67

+2.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

-0.04

+1.19

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.25

0.30

+0.95

Drawdowns

PSFD vs. SRVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFD drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum SRVR drawdown of -40.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFD and SRVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSFDSRVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.94%

-40.99%

+26.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.88%

-14.78%

+8.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.26%

-18.34%

+6.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.94%

-40.99%

+26.05%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-12.28%

+12.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.02%

-15.27%

+13.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.15%

6.83%

-5.68%

Volatility

PSFD vs. SRVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) is 1.16%, while Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF (SRVR) has a volatility of 5.47%. This indicates that PSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SRVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSFDSRVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

5.47%

-4.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.61%

13.12%

-7.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.80%

16.72%

-9.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.48%

19.71%

-9.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.43%

21.44%

-11.01%

PSFD vs. SRVR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than SRVR's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSFD vs. SRVR - Dividend Comparison

PSFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SRVR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.70%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
PSFD
Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SRVR
Pacer Benchmark Data & Infrastructure Real Estate SCTR ETF
2.70%2.67%2.00%3.69%1.70%1.19%1.59%1.61%2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSFD and SRVR have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SRVR has higher volatility (5.47%) compared to PSFD (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFD dropped -14.94% vs SRVR's -40.99%.

On 5-year performance, PSFD leads with 11.94% vs -0.81% for SRVR. On fees, SRVR is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, PSFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, PSFD has performed better with a 11.94% return vs -0.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SRVR is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for PSFD.

SRVR has the higher dividend yield at 2.70%, compared with 0.00% for PSFD.

PSFD is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while SRVR is REIT. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFD and 0.60% for SRVR.

PSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSFD and SRVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer