PSFD vs. RSSY

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSFD (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF) and RSSY (Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSFD returned 17.61% vs 47.81% for RSSY. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSFD charges 0.75%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for RSSY.

Performance

PSFD vs. RSSY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSFD achieves a 6.48% return, which is significantly lower than RSSY's 32.45% return.

PSFD

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 2.53%
• YTD: 6.48%
• 6M: 7.36%
• 1Y: 17.61%
• 3Y*: 14.92%
• 5Y*: 11.78%
• 10Y*: —

RSSY

• 1D: -0.16%
• 1M: 1.78%
• YTD: 32.45%
• 6M: 27.13%
• 1Y: 47.81%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSFD vs. RSSY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF	6.48%	12.93%	7.09%
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	32.45%	-3.52%	1.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PSFD and RSSY is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 30, 2024	0.56

The correlation between PSFD and RSSY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSFD vs. RSSY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSFD

PSFD Risk / Return Rank: 78
PSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 80
PSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 85
PSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
PSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 79

RSSY

RSSY Risk / Return Rank: 93
RSSY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
RSSY Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
RSSY Omega Ratio Rank: 93
RSSY Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
RSSY Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSFD vs. RSSY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSFD	RSSY	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.61	3.63	-1.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.85	4.78	-0.93
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.54	1.65	-0.11
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.01	6.53	-3.52
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	15.39	22.39	-7.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSFD vs. RSSY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSFD Sharpe Ratio is 2.61, which is comparable to the RSSY Sharpe Ratio of 3.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSFD and RSSY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSFD	RSSY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.61	3.63	-1.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.13	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.24	0.75	+0.50

Drawdowns

PSFD vs. RSSY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSFD drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum RSSY drawdown of -29.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFD and RSSY.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSFD	RSSY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.94%	-29.57%	+14.63%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.88%	-7.36%	+1.48%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.26%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-14.94%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.20%	-0.16%	-0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.01%	-7.37%	+5.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.15%	2.14%	-0.99%

Volatility

PSFD vs. RSSY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) is 1.08%, while Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF (RSSY) has a volatility of 2.30%. This indicates that PSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RSSY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSFD	RSSY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.08%	2.30%	-1.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.62%	9.92%	-4.30%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.80%	13.28%	-6.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.48%	18.35%	-7.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.43%	18.35%	-7.92%

PSFD vs. RSSY - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSFD has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is lower than RSSY's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSFD vs. RSSY - Dividend Comparison

PSFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while RSSY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.54%.

Position	TTM	2025
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF	0.00%	0.00%
RSSY Return Stacked US Stocks & Futures Yield ETF	1.54%	2.04%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSFD and RSSY in my portfolio?

PSFD and RSSY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSFD or RSSY?

RSSY has higher volatility (2.30%) compared to PSFD (1.08%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFD dropped -14.94% vs RSSY's -29.57%.

Which ETF is better, PSFD or RSSY?

On 1-year performance, RSSY leads with 47.81% vs 17.61% for PSFD. On fees, PSFD is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, PSFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.08%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSFD or RSSY?

Over the 1-year period, RSSY has performed better with a 47.81% return vs 17.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSFD or RSSY?

PSFD is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for RSSY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSFD or RSSY?

RSSY has the higher dividend yield at 1.54%, compared with 0.00% for PSFD.

What is the main difference between PSFD and RSSY?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Return Stacked. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for PSFD and 1.04% for RSSY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RSSY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.63 vs 2.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.