PSFD vs. NRSH
PSFD (Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF) and NRSH (Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. PSFD is actively managed, while NRSH is passively managed. Over the past year, PSFD returned 18.41% vs 59.65% for NRSH. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.75% expense ratio.
Performance
PSFD vs. NRSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSFD achieves a 6.69% return, which is significantly lower than NRSH's 47.18% return.
PSFD
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.33%
- YTD
- 6.69%
- 6M
- 7.90%
- 1Y
- 18.41%
- 3Y*
- 15.00%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- —
NRSH
- 1D
- 2.36%
- 1M
- 12.97%
- YTD
- 47.18%
- 6M
- 45.33%
- 1Y
- 59.65%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSFD vs. NRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF | 6.69% | 12.93% | 14.54% | 2.86% |
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 47.18% | 12.95% | -6.17% | 8.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSFD and NRSH is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.62 |
The correlation between PSFD and NRSH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
PSFD vs. NRSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
PSFD
NRSH
Technology
Financial Services
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
Utilities
-
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
PSFD
NRSH
Financial Services
PSFD
NRSH
-
Communication Services
PSFD
NRSH
-
Consumer Cyclical
PSFD
NRSH
-
Healthcare
PSFD
NRSH
-
Industrials
PSFD
NRSH
Consumer Defensive
PSFD
NRSH
-
Energy
PSFD
NRSH
Utilities
PSFD
NRSH
-
Real Estate
PSFD
NRSH
Basic Materials
PSFD
NRSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSFD vs. NRSH — Risk / Return Rank
PSFD
NRSH
PSFD vs. NRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) and Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSFD | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.72 | 2.45 | +0.27 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 4.01 | 3.14 | +0.87 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.57 | 1.40 | +0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.20 | 5.37 | -2.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.43 | 16.80 | -0.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSFD | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.72 | 2.45 | +0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.14 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.25 | 1.10 | +0.15 |
Drawdowns
PSFD vs. NRSH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSFD drawdown since its inception was -14.94%, smaller than the maximum NRSH drawdown of -24.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSFD and NRSH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSFD | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.94% | -24.01% | +9.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.88% | -10.94% | +5.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.26% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -14.94% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.02% | -5.63% | +3.61% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.15% | 3.50% | -2.35% |
Volatility
PSFD vs. NRSH - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF (PSFD) is 1.16%, while Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF (NRSH) has a volatility of 9.26%. This indicates that PSFD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSFD | NRSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 9.26% | -8.10% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.61% | 20.31% | -14.70% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.80% | 24.45% | -17.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.48% | 21.56% | -11.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.43% | 21.56% | -11.13% |
PSFD vs. NRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both PSFD and NRSH have an expense ratio of 0.75%.
Dividends
PSFD vs. NRSH - Dividend Comparison
PSFD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NRSH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NRSH Aztlan North America Nearshoring Stock Selection ETF | 0.28% | 0.42% | 0.90% | 0.17% |
PSFD Pacer Swan SOS Flex (December) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSFD and NRSH have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NRSH has higher volatility (9.26%) compared to PSFD (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSFD dropped -14.94% vs NRSH's -24.01%.
On 1-year performance, NRSH leads with 59.65% vs 18.41% for PSFD. Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. On volatility, PSFD has been the lower-risk option at 1.16%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NRSH has performed better with a 59.65% return vs 18.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSFD and NRSH have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.
NRSH has the higher dividend yield at 0.28%, compared with 0.00% for PSFD.
They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Aztlan.
PSFD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSFD and NRSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer