PSECX vs. CHDEX
Compare and contrast key facts about 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) and Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund (CHDEX).
PSECX is managed by Pinnacle Capital Management. It was launched on Jan 21, 2011. CHDEX is managed by Cullen Funds Trust. It was launched on Aug 1, 2003.
Performance
PSECX vs. CHDEX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSECX vs. CHDEX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund | -2.01% | 8.04% | 14.49% | 10.64% | -10.66% | 25.43% | 0.78% | 23.99% | -5.18% | 5.16% |
CHDEX Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund | 2.11% | 18.04% | 20.77% | 2.76% | -4.50% | 26.34% | -4.36% | 19.69% | -5.40% | 16.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSECX achieves a -2.01% return, which is significantly lower than CHDEX's 2.11% return. Over the past 10 years, PSECX has underperformed CHDEX with an annualized return of 6.86%, while CHDEX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.47% annualized return.
PSECX
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- -7.25%
- YTD
- -2.01%
- 6M
- -3.71%
- 1Y
- 6.71%
- 3Y*
- 9.78%
- 5Y*
- 7.18%
- 10Y*
- 6.86%
CHDEX
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -5.09%
- YTD
- 2.11%
- 6M
- 5.21%
- 1Y
- 15.45%
- 3Y*
- 14.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.15%
- 10Y*
- 9.47%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSECX vs. CHDEX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSECX has a 2.02% expense ratio, which is higher than CHDEX's 1.00% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSECX vs. CHDEX — Risk / Return Rank
PSECX
CHDEX
PSECX vs. CHDEX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for 1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) and Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund (CHDEX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSECX | CHDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.59 | 1.23 | -0.64 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.93 | 1.72 | -0.79 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.26 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.82 | 1.41 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.31 | 6.55 | -3.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSECX | CHDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 | 1.23 | -0.64 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.61 | 0.72 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.59 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.54 | -0.01 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSECX and CHDEX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PSECX vs. CHDEX - Dividend Comparison
PSECX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, less than CHDEX's 14.96% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSECX 1789 Growth and Income Fund | 0.87% | 0.85% | 3.88% | 2.71% | 4.60% | 1.53% | 0.27% | 1.16% | 6.78% | 0.59% | 0.31% | 5.12% |
CHDEX Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund | 14.96% | 15.18% | 25.41% | 12.44% | 7.46% | 10.89% | 11.08% | 6.24% | 14.14% | 9.93% | 5.24% | 5.05% |
Drawdowns
PSECX vs. CHDEX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSECX drawdown since its inception was -31.13%, smaller than the maximum CHDEX drawdown of -49.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSECX and CHDEX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSECX | CHDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.13% | -49.12% | +17.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.36% | -10.77% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.47% | -18.57% | +0.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.13% | -37.04% | +5.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.44% | -5.86% | -1.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.90% | -6.79% | +2.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.07% | 2.40% | -0.33% |
Volatility
PSECX vs. CHDEX - Volatility Comparison
1789 Growth and Income Fund (PSECX) has a higher volatility of 3.06% compared to Cullen High Dividend Equity Fund (CHDEX) at 2.87%. This indicates that PSECX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHDEX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSECX | CHDEX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.06% | 2.87% | +0.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.60% | 6.87% | +0.73% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.13% | 13.52% | -0.39% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.90% | 14.09% | -2.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.17% | 16.10% | -2.93% |