PSDM vs. DOXLX
PSDM (PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF) and DOXLX (Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund) are both funds - PSDM is a Multisector Bonds fund actively managed by PGIM, while DOXLX is a Global Bonds fund actively managed by Dodge & Cox. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSDM returned 5.16% vs 7.35% for DOXLX. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSDM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.37%/yr for DOXLX.
Performance
PSDM vs. DOXLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSDM achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than DOXLX's 1.33% return.
PSDM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DOXLX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 1.33%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- 1Y
- 7.35%
- 3Y*
- 7.07%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSDM vs. DOXLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.23% | 6.16% | 5.48% | 3.96% |
DOXLX Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund | 1.33% | 11.60% | 0.63% | 5.32% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSDM and DOXLX is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023 | 0.79 |
The correlation between PSDM and DOXLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSDM vs. DOXLX — Risk / Return Rank
PSDM
DOXLX
PSDM vs. DOXLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM) and Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund (DOXLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSDM | DOXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.26 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.54 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.32 | +0.32 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 2.02 | +2.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.69 | 6.47 | +13.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSDM | DOXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 1.70 | +1.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.97 | 1.17 | +1.80 |
Drawdowns
PSDM vs. DOXLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSDM drawdown since its inception was -1.19%, smaller than the maximum DOXLX drawdown of -8.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSDM and DOXLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSDM | DOXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -8.14% | +6.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -3.65% | +2.46% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -6.12% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -1.38% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -1.63% | +1.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 1.14% | -0.88% |
Volatility
PSDM vs. DOXLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM) is 0.53%, while Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund (DOXLX) has a volatility of 1.68%. This indicates that PSDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DOXLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSDM | DOXLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 1.68% | -1.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.28% | 3.36% | -2.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75% | 4.34% | -2.59% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.01% | 5.48% | -3.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.01% | 5.48% | -3.47% |
PSDM vs. DOXLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSDM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DOXLX's 0.37% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSDM vs. DOXLX - Dividend Comparison
PSDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, more than DOXLX's 4.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DOXLX Dodge & Cox Global Bond Fund | 4.11% | 4.14% | 4.81% | 3.36% | 4.58% |
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 4.85% | 4.57% | 5.17% | 2.91% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSDM and DOXLX have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DOXLX has higher volatility (1.68%) compared to PSDM (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSDM dropped -1.19% vs DOXLX's -8.14%.
PSDM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSDM and DOXLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer