PSDM vs. CARY
PSDM (PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF) and CARY (Angel Oak Income ETF) are both Multisector Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, PSDM returned 5.16% vs 6.94% for CARY. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PSDM charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for CARY.
Performance
PSDM vs. CARY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSDM achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly lower than CARY's 1.74% return.
PSDM
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 1.61%
- 1Y
- 5.16%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CARY
- 1D
- -0.05%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.74%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- 1Y
- 6.94%
- 3Y*
- 7.35%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSDM vs. CARY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 1.23% | 6.16% | 5.48% | 3.96% |
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF | 1.74% | 7.54% | 6.93% | 4.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSDM and CARY is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 27, 2023 | 0.60 |
The correlation between PSDM and CARY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSDM vs. CARY — Risk / Return Rank
PSDM
CARY
PSDM vs. CARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM) and Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSDM | CARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.96 | 3.96 | -1.00 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.06 | 6.28 | -1.22 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.64 | 1.89 | -0.25 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.35 | 5.45 | -1.10 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.69 | 23.64 | -3.95 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSDM | CARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.96 | 3.96 | -1.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 2.97 | 2.65 | +0.32 |
Drawdowns
PSDM vs. CARY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSDM drawdown since its inception was -1.19%, smaller than the maximum CARY drawdown of -1.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSDM and CARY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSDM | CARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.19% | -1.96% | +0.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.19% | -1.28% | +0.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -1.96% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.16% | -0.14% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -0.33% | +0.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.26% | 0.29% | -0.03% |
Volatility
PSDM vs. CARY - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF (PSDM) is 0.53%, while Angel Oak Income ETF (CARY) has a volatility of 0.56%. This indicates that PSDM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CARY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSDM | CARY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.53% | 0.56% | -0.03% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.28% | 1.30% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.75% | 1.76% | -0.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2.01% | 2.74% | -0.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 2.01% | 2.74% | -0.73% |
PSDM vs. CARY - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSDM has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than CARY's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSDM vs. CARY - Dividend Comparison
PSDM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.85%, less than CARY's 5.93% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CARY Angel Oak Income ETF | 5.93% | 6.13% | 6.10% | 6.38% | 0.48% |
PSDM PGIM Short Duration Multi-Sector Bond ETF | 4.85% | 4.57% | 5.17% | 2.91% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSDM and CARY have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CARY has higher volatility (0.56%) compared to PSDM (0.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSDM dropped -1.19% vs CARY's -1.96%.
On 1-year performance, CARY leads with 6.94% vs 5.16% for PSDM. On fees, PSDM is cheaper at 0.40% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, CARY has performed better with a 6.94% return vs 5.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
PSDM is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for CARY.
CARY has the higher dividend yield at 5.93%, compared with 4.85% for PSDM.
They also come from different issuers: PGIM and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for PSDM and 0.80% for CARY.
CARY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.96 vs 2.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for PSDM and CARY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer