PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSDIX vs. PFN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSDIX vs. PFN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Short Duration Municipal Income Fund (PSDIX) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSDIX achieves a 1.10% return, which is significantly higher than PFN's -4.15% return. Over the past 10 years, PSDIX has underperformed PFN with an annualized return of 2.13%, while PFN has yielded a comparatively higher 7.89% annualized return.


PSDIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.10%
6M
1.51%
1Y
4.33%
3Y*
4.39%
5Y*
2.30%
10Y*
2.13%

PFN

1D
-1.16%
1M
-3.36%
YTD
-4.15%
6M
-2.44%
1Y
5.30%
3Y*
10.63%
5Y*
1.97%
10Y*
7.89%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSDIX vs. PFN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSDIX
PIMCO Short Duration Municipal Income Fund
1.10%5.63%3.46%4.26%-2.67%0.35%2.89%3.72%1.43%2.31%
PFN
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II
-4.15%13.07%15.72%15.43%-17.65%5.14%3.97%21.84%0.94%20.58%

Correlation

The correlation between PSDIX and PFN is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2004

0.12

The correlation between PSDIX and PFN shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (all time) to 0.23 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSDIX vs. PFN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSDIX
PSDIX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
PSDIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSDIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSDIX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
PSDIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSDIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

PFN
PFN Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
PFN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PFN Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
PFN Omega Ratio Rank: 77
Omega Ratio Rank
PFN Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
PFN Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSDIX vs. PFN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Short Duration Municipal Income Fund (PSDIX) and PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSDIXPFNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.60

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+5.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

2.37

1.11

+1.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.09

0.49

+3.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.49

1.95

+13.54

PSDIX vs. PFN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSDIX Sharpe Ratio is 3.13, which is higher than the PFN Sharpe Ratio of 0.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSDIX and PFN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSDIXPFNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.13

0.53

+2.60

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.24

0.14

+1.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.21

0.44

+0.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.79

0.28

+0.51

Drawdowns

PSDIX vs. PFN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSDIX drawdown since its inception was -19.27%, smaller than the maximum PFN drawdown of -80.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSDIX and PFN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSDIXPFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.27%

-80.08%

+60.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.07%

-10.77%

+9.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.80%

-14.31%

+12.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.00%

-33.45%

+28.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.00%

-45.70%

+40.70%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-5.19%

+5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.01%

-11.83%

+9.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

2.72%

-2.44%

Volatility

PSDIX vs. PFN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Short Duration Municipal Income Fund (PSDIX) is 0.54%, while PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II (PFN) has a volatility of 3.39%. This indicates that PSDIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PFN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSDIXPFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

3.39%

-2.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.08%

8.89%

-7.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.40%

10.05%

-8.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.87%

14.66%

-12.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.76%

18.19%

-16.43%

PSDIX vs. PFN - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSDIX has a 0.33% expense ratio, which is lower than PFN's 1.74% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSDIX vs. PFN - Dividend Comparison

PSDIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.28%, less than PFN's 12.60% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PFN
PIMCO Income Strategy Fund II
12.60%11.49%11.57%11.92%12.19%9.71%9.67%9.07%10.81%9.20%10.12%11.74%
PSDIX
PIMCO Short Duration Municipal Income Fund
3.28%4.35%3.88%2.69%1.24%1.06%1.43%2.10%1.90%1.57%1.23%1.28%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSDIX and PFN have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PFN has higher volatility (3.39%) compared to PSDIX (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSDIX dropped -19.27% vs PFN's -80.08%.

PSDIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.13 vs 0.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSDIX and PFN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer