PSCSX vs. PFORX
Compare and contrast key facts about PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX).
PSCSX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Mar 31, 2006. PFORX is managed by PIMCO. It was launched on Dec 1, 1992.
Performance
PSCSX vs. PFORX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSCSX vs. PFORX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCSX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | -3.82% | 12.57% | 12.60% | 17.09% | -23.95% | 14.15% | 19.50% | 30.55% | -12.05% | 17.64% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | -2.23% | 4.33% | 5.70% | 9.52% | -10.33% | -1.67% | 6.17% | 7.64% | 2.64% | 3.52% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCSX achieves a -3.82% return, which is significantly lower than PFORX's -2.23% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCSX has outperformed PFORX with an annualized return of 9.82%, while PFORX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.77% annualized return.
PSCSX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -9.85%
- YTD
- -3.82%
- 6M
- -2.90%
- 1Y
- 18.76%
- 3Y*
- 11.68%
- 5Y*
- 1.92%
- 10Y*
- 9.82%
PFORX
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- -3.69%
- YTD
- -2.23%
- 6M
- -1.20%
- 1Y
- 1.73%
- 3Y*
- 4.71%
- 5Y*
- 1.08%
- 10Y*
- 2.77%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSCSX vs. PFORX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCSX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than PFORX's 0.50% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSCSX vs. PFORX — Risk / Return Rank
PSCSX
PFORX
PSCSX vs. PFORX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) and PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCSX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.77 | 0.64 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 0.89 | +0.32 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.12 | +0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.99 | 0.61 | +0.38 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.69 | 2.82 | +0.88 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCSX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 | 0.64 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.31 | -0.23 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.90 | -0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.37 | 1.25 | -0.88 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCSX and PFORX is 0.00, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
PSCSX vs. PFORX - Dividend Comparison
PSCSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, more than PFORX's 3.88% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCSX PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund | 4.35% | 5.63% | 4.34% | 2.36% | 26.32% | 19.21% | 5.69% | 8.77% | 12.86% | 5.84% | 3.41% | 8.45% |
PFORX PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) | 3.88% | 4.23% | 4.91% | 3.02% | 3.65% | 1.55% | 2.46% | 6.86% | 2.90% | 1.46% | 1.38% | 9.12% |
Drawdowns
PSCSX vs. PFORX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCSX drawdown since its inception was -58.02%, which is greater than PFORX's maximum drawdown of -13.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCSX and PFORX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCSX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.02% | -13.87% | -44.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.12% | -3.99% | -11.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -35.03% | -13.71% | -21.32% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -46.15% | -13.87% | -32.28% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.21% | -3.69% | -8.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.29% | -1.95% | -8.34% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.20% | 0.87% | +3.33% |
Volatility
PSCSX vs. PFORX - Volatility Comparison
PIMCO StocksPLUS Small Fund (PSCSX) has a higher volatility of 7.13% compared to PIMCO International Bond Fund (U.S. Dollar-Hedged) (PFORX) at 1.93%. This indicates that PSCSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PFORX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSCSX | PFORX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.13% | 1.93% | +5.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.00% | 2.53% | +12.47% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.09% | 3.38% | +20.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.39% | 3.46% | +19.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.15% | 3.08% | +21.07% |