PSCQ vs. XLRI
PSCQ (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF) and XLRI (State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCQ is a Options Trading fund actively managed by Pacer, while XLRI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street. Both are actively managed. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. PSCQ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XLRI.
Performance
PSCQ vs. XLRI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCQ achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than XLRI's 6.80% return.
PSCQ
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 1.42%
- 6M
- 5.58%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 12.81%
- 3Y*
- 12.31%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLRI
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- 6M
- 6.38%
- YTD
- 6.80%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PSCQ vs. XLRI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
PSCQ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF | 6.46% | 4.64% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 6.80% | -0.57% |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCQ and XLRI is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.22 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PSCQ vs. XLRI — Risk / Return Rank
PSCQ
XLRI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
PSCQ vs. XLRI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) and State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLRI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PSCQ | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.77 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.71 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PSCQ vs. XLRI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCQ drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, which is greater than XLRI's maximum drawdown of -7.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCQ and XLRI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCQ | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.92% | -7.12% | -2.80% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.58% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.92% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.96% | +0.96% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.56% | -1.62% | +0.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.92% | — | — |
Volatility
PSCQ vs. XLRI - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PSCQ | XLRI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.81% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.74% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.89% | 11.23% | -5.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 11.23% | -3.69% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.54% | 11.23% | -3.69% |
PSCQ vs. XLRI - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than XLRI's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
PSCQ vs. XLRI - Dividend Comparison
PSCQ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLRI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.73%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
PSCQ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLRI State Street Real Estate Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 13.73% | 6.85% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PSCQ and XLRI have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLRI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLRI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PSCQ.
XLRI has the higher dividend yield at 13.73%, compared with 0.00% for PSCQ.
PSCQ is categorized as Options Trading, while XLRI is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSCQ and 0.35% for XLRI.
Find the right allocation for PSCQ and XLRI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer