PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSCQ vs. XDOC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSCQ vs. XDOC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PSCQ

1D
-0.86%
1M
0.54%
YTD
4.64%
6M
5.04%
1Y
14.83%
3Y*
12.25%
5Y*
10Y*

XDOC

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCQ vs. XDOC - Yearly Performance Comparison


PSCQ vs. XDOC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
PSCQ
XDOC

Technology

36.2%
35.4%

Financial Services

11.9%
13.3%

Communication Services

10.9%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

10.1%
10.7%

Healthcare

8.4%
8.7%

Industrials

8.1%
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

4.9%
4.9%

Energy

3.5%
3.0%

Utilities

2.3%
2.4%

Real Estate

1.9%
1.9%

Basic Materials

1.8%
1.6%

Technology

PSCQ
36.2%
XDOC
35.4%

Financial Services

PSCQ
11.9%
XDOC
13.3%

Communication Services

PSCQ
10.9%
XDOC
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

PSCQ
10.1%
XDOC
10.7%

Healthcare

PSCQ
8.4%
XDOC
8.7%

Industrials

PSCQ
8.1%
XDOC
7.5%

Consumer Defensive

PSCQ
4.9%
XDOC
4.9%

Energy

PSCQ
3.5%
XDOC
3.0%

Utilities

PSCQ
2.3%
XDOC
2.4%

Real Estate

PSCQ
1.9%
XDOC
1.9%

Basic Materials

PSCQ
1.8%
XDOC
1.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSCQ vs. XDOC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCQ
PSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
PSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
PSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

XDOC
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCQ vs. XDOC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) and Innovator U.S. Equity Accelerated ETF - October (XDOC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


PSCQXDOCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.35

PSCQ vs. XDOC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PSCQXDOCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.20

Drawdowns

PSCQ vs. XDOC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCQ drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, which is greater than XDOC's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCQ and XDOC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSCQXDOCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.92%

0.00%

-9.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.58%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.87%

0.00%

-0.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.58%

0.00%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.91%

Volatility

PSCQ vs. XDOC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSCQXDOCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.94%

0.00%

+5.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.57%

0.00%

+7.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.57%

0.00%

+7.57%

PSCQ vs. XDOC - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than XDOC's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSCQ vs. XDOC - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSCQ nor XDOC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


On fees, PSCQ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PSCQ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for XDOC.

PSCQ and XDOC have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSCQ and 0.79% for XDOC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSCQ and XDOC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer