PSCQ vs. APRQ

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

PSCQ (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF) and APRQ (Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. PSCQ charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for APRQ.

Performance

PSCQ vs. APRQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PSCQ

• 1D: -0.86%
• 1M: 0.54%
• YTD: 4.64%
• 6M: 5.04%
• 1Y: 14.83%
• 3Y*: 12.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRQ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCQ vs. APRQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PSCQ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF	4.19%
APRQ Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April	0.00%

PSCQ vs. APRQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCQ	APRQ
Technology	36.2%	32.0%
Financial Services	11.9%	13.7%
Communication Services	10.9%	9.9%
Consumer Cyclical	10.1%	11.6%
Healthcare	8.4%	10.5%
Industrials	8.1%	7.4%
Consumer Defensive	4.9%	5.5%
Energy	3.5%	3.2%
Utilities	2.3%	2.5%
Real Estate	1.9%	2.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.7%

Return for Risk

PSCQ vs. APRQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCQ

PSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 82
PSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
PSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
PSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 87
PSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
PSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCQ vs. APRQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (October) ETF (PSCQ) and Innovator Premium Income 40 Barrier ETF - April (APRQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSCQ	APRQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.51	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.69	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	16.35	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSCQ	APRQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.51	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.20	—	—

Drawdowns

PSCQ vs. APRQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCQ drawdown since its inception was -9.92%, which is greater than APRQ's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCQ and APRQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCQ	APRQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.92%	0.00%	-9.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.58%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.87%	0.00%	-0.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.58%	0.00%	-1.58%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.91%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PSCQ	APRQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.17%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.54%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.94%	0.00%	+5.94%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.57%	0.00%	+7.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.57%	0.00%	+7.57%

PSCQ vs. APRQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCQ has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than APRQ's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCQ vs. APRQ - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSCQ nor APRQ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, PSCQ or APRQ?

On fees, PSCQ is cheaper at 0.60% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCQ or APRQ?

PSCQ is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for APRQ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCQ or APRQ?

PSCQ and APRQ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PSCQ and APRQ?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for PSCQ and 0.79% for APRQ.