PSCNX vs. VRTGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Penn Capital Special Situations Small Cap Equity Fund (PSCNX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX).
PSCNX is managed by Penn Capital Management. It was launched on Dec 17, 2015. VRTGX is managed by Vanguard. It was launched on May 25, 2011.
Performance
PSCNX vs. VRTGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSCNX vs. VRTGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCNX Penn Capital Special Situations Small Cap Equity Fund | 3.54% | 12.07% | 8.04% | 14.14% | -17.98% | 32.82% | 27.62% | 30.69% | -16.22% | 15.97% |
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | -2.79% | 12.97% | 15.26% | 18.80% | -26.30% | 2.82% | 34.81% | 28.84% | -9.21% | 22.27% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSCNX achieves a 3.54% return, which is significantly higher than VRTGX's -2.79% return. Over the past 10 years, PSCNX has outperformed VRTGX with an annualized return of 12.29%, while VRTGX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.83% annualized return.
PSCNX
- 1D
- 3.48%
- 1M
- -5.25%
- YTD
- 3.54%
- 6M
- 1.18%
- 1Y
- 25.88%
- 3Y*
- 11.58%
- 5Y*
- 4.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
VRTGX
- 1D
- 4.27%
- 1M
- -7.24%
- YTD
- -2.79%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- 23.68%
- 3Y*
- 12.32%
- 5Y*
- 1.34%
- 10Y*
- 9.83%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSCNX vs. VRTGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSCNX has a 1.71% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTGX's 0.08% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSCNX vs. VRTGX — Risk / Return Rank
PSCNX
VRTGX
PSCNX vs. VRTGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Penn Capital Special Situations Small Cap Equity Fund (PSCNX) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSCNX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.94 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.50 | 1.46 | +0.04 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.18 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 1.54 | +0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.91 | 5.21 | +0.69 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSCNX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.94 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.19 | 0.05 | +0.14 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 | 0.40 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.46 | -0.02 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSCNX and VRTGX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PSCNX vs. VRTGX - Dividend Comparison
PSCNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.23%, more than VRTGX's 0.73% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSCNX Penn Capital Special Situations Small Cap Equity Fund | 7.23% | 7.49% | 1.56% | 0.24% | 1.76% | 23.64% | 0.00% | 1.24% | 9.83% | 11.93% | 7.11% | 0.00% |
VRTGX Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares | 0.73% | 0.57% | 0.62% | 0.85% | 0.78% | 0.54% | 0.53% | 0.90% | 0.85% | 0.75% | 1.07% | 0.84% |
Drawdowns
PSCNX vs. VRTGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSCNX drawdown since its inception was -50.15%, which is greater than VRTGX's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCNX and VRTGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSCNX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.15% | -41.97% | -8.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.82% | -14.80% | -2.02% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.09% | -40.48% | +8.39% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -50.15% | -41.97% | -8.18% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.46% | -11.16% | +5.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.98% | -10.53% | +0.55% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.42% | 4.36% | +0.06% |
Volatility
PSCNX vs. VRTGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Penn Capital Special Situations Small Cap Equity Fund (PSCNX) is 8.09%, while Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTGX) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that PSCNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VRTGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSCNX | VRTGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.09% | 8.82% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.52% | 16.59% | -0.07% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.49% | 25.39% | +1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.53% | 24.53% | +1.00% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.88% | 24.45% | +1.43% |