PSCJ vs. ZFEB

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSCJ (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF) and ZFEB (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February) are both Defined Outcome funds. PSCJ is passively managed, while ZFEB is actively managed. Over the past year, PSCJ returned 15.45% vs 7.80% for ZFEB. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSCJ charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for ZFEB.

Performance

PSCJ vs. ZFEB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF (PSCJ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCJ achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly higher than ZFEB's 2.36% return.

PSCJ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 5.45%
• 1Y: 15.45%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ZFEB

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 0.81%
• YTD: 2.36%
• 6M: 3.03%
• 1Y: 7.80%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCJ vs. ZFEB - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
PSCJ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF	4.75%	11.12%
ZFEB Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February	2.36%	6.10%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCJ and ZFEB is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2025	0.83

The correlation between PSCJ and ZFEB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

PSCJ vs. ZFEB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCJ

PSCJ Risk / Return Rank: 85
PSCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PSCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PSCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PSCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PSCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

ZFEB

ZFEB Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZFEB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZFEB Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZFEB Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
ZFEB Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCJ vs. ZFEB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF (PSCJ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSCJ	ZFEB	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	3.55	-0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	5.61	-1.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	1.79	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.73	5.81	-2.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.66	28.36	-7.70
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSCJ vs. ZFEB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is comparable to the ZFEB Sharpe Ratio of 3.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCJ and ZFEB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSCJ	ZFEB	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	3.55	-0.86
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	2.24	-1.19

Drawdowns

PSCJ vs. ZFEB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCJ drawdown since its inception was -11.87%, which is greater than ZFEB's maximum drawdown of -3.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCJ and ZFEB.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCJ	ZFEB	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.87%	-3.00%	-8.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.16%	-1.35%	-2.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.87%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.04%	+0.04%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-0.36%	-1.83%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	0.28%	+0.47%

Volatility

PSCJ vs. ZFEB - Volatility Comparison

Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF (PSCJ) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr February (ZFEB) have volatilities of 0.37% and 0.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCJ	ZFEB	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.37%	0.38%	-0.01%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.05%	1.45%	+2.60%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.80%	2.21%	+3.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.72%	2.88%	+5.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.72%	2.88%	+5.84%

PSCJ vs. ZFEB - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than ZFEB's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCJ vs. ZFEB - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSCJ nor ZFEB has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCJ and ZFEB in my portfolio?

PSCJ and ZFEB have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCJ or ZFEB?

ZFEB has higher volatility (0.38%) compared to PSCJ (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCJ dropped -11.87% vs ZFEB's -3.00%.

Which ETF is better, PSCJ or ZFEB?

On 1-year performance, PSCJ leads with 15.45% vs 7.80% for ZFEB. On fees, PSCJ is cheaper at 0.61% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCJ or ZFEB?

Over the 1-year period, PSCJ has performed better with a 15.45% return vs 7.80%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCJ or ZFEB?

PSCJ is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for ZFEB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCJ or ZFEB?

PSCJ and ZFEB have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PSCJ and ZFEB?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSCJ and 0.79% for ZFEB.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZFEB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.55 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.