PSCJ vs. NAPR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PSCJ (Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF) and NAPR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - PSCJ is a Defined Outcome fund tracking the SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while NAPR is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, PSCJ returned 13.62%/yr vs 13.26%/yr for NAPR. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PSCJ charges 0.61%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for NAPR.

Performance

PSCJ vs. NAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF (PSCJ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSCJ achieves a 4.75% return, which is significantly lower than NAPR's 10.51% return.

PSCJ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 1.33%
• YTD: 4.75%
• 6M: 5.45%
• 1Y: 15.45%
• 3Y*: 13.62%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

NAPR

• 1D: -0.12%
• 1M: 2.09%
• YTD: 10.51%
• 6M: 11.15%
• 1Y: 18.45%
• 3Y*: 13.26%
• 5Y*: 10.10%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSCJ vs. NAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
PSCJ Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF	4.75%	12.80%	14.74%	18.48%	-7.48%	3.30%
NAPR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April	10.51%	6.56%	13.29%	30.60%	-12.13%	3.74%

Correlation

The correlation between PSCJ and NAPR is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.78
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.82
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2021	0.85

The correlation between PSCJ and NAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

PSCJ vs. NAPR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	PSCJ	NAPR
Technology	34.1%	50.7%
Financial Services	12.6%	0.2%
Communication Services	11.2%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	10.6%	12.5%
Healthcare	9.4%	5.1%
Industrials	8.0%	3.3%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	8.7%
Energy	3.2%	0.7%
Utilities	2.3%	1.6%
Real Estate	1.9%	0.1%
Basic Materials	1.8%	1.3%

Return for Risk

PSCJ vs. NAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSCJ

PSCJ Risk / Return Rank: 85
PSCJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
PSCJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
PSCJ Omega Ratio Rank: 91
PSCJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
PSCJ Martin Ratio Rank: 90

NAPR

NAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
NAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
NAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
NAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSCJ vs. NAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF (PSCJ) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	PSCJ	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.69	4.78	-2.09
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	4.11	8.66	-4.55
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.60	2.18	-0.59
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.73	14.95	-11.22
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	20.66	84.84	-64.18
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSCJ vs. NAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSCJ Sharpe Ratio is 2.69, which is lower than the NAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSCJ and NAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PSCJ	NAPR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.69	4.78	-2.09
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.90	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.05	1.07	-0.02

Drawdowns

PSCJ vs. NAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSCJ drawdown since its inception was -11.87%, smaller than the maximum NAPR drawdown of -16.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSCJ and NAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	PSCJ	NAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-11.87%	-16.53%	+4.66%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.16%	-1.24%	-2.92%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.87%	-14.52%	+2.65%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-16.53%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.12%	+0.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.19%	-2.28%	+0.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.75%	0.22%	+0.53%

Volatility

PSCJ vs. NAPR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Pacer Swan SOS Conservative (July) ETF (PSCJ) is 0.37%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Power Buffer ETF - April (NAPR) has a volatility of 1.10%. This indicates that PSCJ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	PSCJ	NAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.37%	1.10%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.05%	2.82%	+1.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.80%	3.89%	+1.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.72%	11.27%	-2.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.72%	10.61%	-1.89%

PSCJ vs. NAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSCJ has a 0.61% expense ratio, which is lower than NAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

PSCJ vs. NAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither PSCJ nor NAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PSCJ and NAPR in my portfolio?

PSCJ and NAPR have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, PSCJ or NAPR?

NAPR has higher volatility (1.10%) compared to PSCJ (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSCJ dropped -11.87% vs NAPR's -16.53%.

Which ETF is better, PSCJ or NAPR?

On 3-year performance, PSCJ leads with 13.62% vs 13.26% for NAPR. On fees, PSCJ is cheaper at 0.61% per year. On volatility, PSCJ has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, PSCJ or NAPR?

Over the 3-year period, PSCJ has performed better with a 13.62% return vs 13.26%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, PSCJ or NAPR?

PSCJ is cheaper with a 0.61% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for NAPR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PSCJ or NAPR?

PSCJ and NAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PSCJ and NAPR?

PSCJ is categorized as Defined Outcome, while NAPR is Nasdaq-100. PSCJ tracks SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust, while NAPR tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.61% for PSCJ and 0.79% for NAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.78 vs 2.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.