PSBMX vs. CMNWX
Compare and contrast key facts about Principal SmallCap Fund (PSBMX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX).
PSBMX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Dec 6, 2000. CMNWX is managed by Principal. It was launched on Nov 24, 1986.
Performance
PSBMX vs. CMNWX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
PSBMX vs. CMNWX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSBMX Principal SmallCap Fund | -5.23% | 14.58% | 8.53% | 15.11% | -20.51% | 19.21% | 21.44% | 26.97% | -11.42% | 12.35% |
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund | -6.68% | 13.27% | 32.14% | 25.01% | -16.37% | 27.45% | 18.36% | 32.21% | -4.12% | 20.64% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, PSBMX achieves a -5.23% return, which is significantly higher than CMNWX's -6.68% return. Over the past 10 years, PSBMX has underperformed CMNWX with an annualized return of 8.98%, while CMNWX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.74% annualized return.
PSBMX
- 1D
- -1.36%
- 1M
- -8.91%
- YTD
- -5.23%
- 6M
- -1.59%
- 1Y
- 18.85%
- 3Y*
- 8.65%
- 5Y*
- 2.64%
- 10Y*
- 8.98%
CMNWX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -7.99%
- YTD
- -6.68%
- 6M
- -5.57%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 18.16%
- 5Y*
- 12.23%
- 10Y*
- 13.74%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
PSBMX vs. CMNWX - Expense Ratio Comparison
PSBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than CMNWX's 0.80% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
PSBMX vs. CMNWX — Risk / Return Rank
PSBMX
CMNWX
PSBMX vs. CMNWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SmallCap Fund (PSBMX) and Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| PSBMX | CMNWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 0.74 | +0.07 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.24 | 1.17 | +0.07 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.16 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.00 | 0.91 | +0.08 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.08 | 4.36 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PSBMX | CMNWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 0.74 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.12 | 0.73 | -0.61 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 | 0.80 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.69 | -0.33 |
Correlation
The correlation between PSBMX and CMNWX is 0.89, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
PSBMX vs. CMNWX - Dividend Comparison
PSBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.89%, less than CMNWX's 9.38% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PSBMX Principal SmallCap Fund | 5.89% | 5.58% | 3.66% | 2.91% | 0.00% | 7.82% | 2.28% | 5.83% | 16.72% | 8.65% | 2.29% | 3.80% |
CMNWX Principal Capital Appreciation Fund | 9.38% | 8.75% | 10.03% | 0.71% | 0.69% | 9.52% | 5.33% | 8.37% | 46.60% | 7.72% | 10.32% | 5.42% |
Drawdowns
PSBMX vs. CMNWX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PSBMX drawdown since its inception was -60.15%, which is greater than CMNWX's maximum drawdown of -50.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSBMX and CMNWX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| PSBMX | CMNWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.15% | -50.43% | -9.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.35% | -11.50% | -2.85% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.32% | -23.35% | -7.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.04% | -33.26% | -8.78% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.10% | -8.91% | -3.19% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.85% | -6.99% | -3.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.58% | 2.41% | +1.17% |
Volatility
PSBMX vs. CMNWX - Volatility Comparison
Principal SmallCap Fund (PSBMX) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Principal Capital Appreciation Fund (CMNWX) at 4.58%. This indicates that PSBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMNWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| PSBMX | CMNWX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 4.58% | +2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.24% | 9.55% | +3.69% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.74% | 17.32% | +5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.98% | 16.76% | +5.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.29% | 17.14% | +5.15% |