PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PSBMX vs. AUERX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PSBMX vs. AUERX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Principal SmallCap Fund (PSBMX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSBMX achieves a 15.59% return, which is significantly higher than AUERX's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, PSBMX has underperformed AUERX with an annualized return of 10.33%, while AUERX has yielded a comparatively higher 15.55% annualized return.


PSBMX

1D
-0.84%
1M
1.27%
6M
11.58%
YTD
15.59%
1Y
29.78%
3Y*
13.84%
5Y*
5.73%
10Y*
10.33%

AUERX

1D
0.28%
1M
-1.99%
6M
11.99%
YTD
13.71%
1Y
37.43%
3Y*
23.15%
5Y*
20.30%
10Y*
15.55%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PSBMX vs. AUERX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSBMX
Principal SmallCap Fund
15.59%14.58%8.53%15.11%-20.51%19.21%21.44%26.97%-11.42%12.35%
AUERX
Auer Growth Fund
13.71%30.10%11.12%21.42%9.95%45.11%-1.85%27.96%-25.63%28.75%

Correlation

The correlation between PSBMX and AUERX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 26, 2007

0.84

The correlation between PSBMX and AUERX shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PSBMX vs. AUERX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PSBMX
PSBMX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
PSBMX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSBMX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSBMX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
PSBMX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSBMX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank

AUERX
AUERX Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
AUERX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AUERX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
AUERX Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
AUERX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
AUERX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSBMX vs. AUERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Principal SmallCap Fund (PSBMX) and Auer Growth Fund (AUERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PSBMXAUERXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.39

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.39

3.69

-1.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.33

14.64

-5.30

PSBMX vs. AUERX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSBMX Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the AUERX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSBMX and AUERX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PSBMX vs. AUERX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSBMX drawdown since its inception was -60.15%, smaller than the maximum AUERX drawdown of -67.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSBMX and AUERX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PSBMXAUERXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-60.15%

-67.23%

+7.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.10%

-10.06%

-2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.13%

-34.80%

+9.67%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.32%

-34.80%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.04%

-51.89%

+9.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.27%

-3.22%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.75%

-24.75%

+14.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

2.53%

+0.57%

Volatility

PSBMX vs. AUERX - Volatility Comparison

Principal SmallCap Fund (PSBMX) has a higher volatility of 5.20% compared to Auer Growth Fund (AUERX) at 4.47%. This indicates that PSBMX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AUERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PSBMXAUERXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.20%

4.47%

+0.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.11%

12.48%

+1.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.15%

16.66%

+1.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.08%

24.81%

-2.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.35%

24.34%

-1.99%

PSBMX vs. AUERX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSBMX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is lower than AUERX's 2.37% expense ratio.


Dividends

PSBMX vs. AUERX - Dividend Comparison

PSBMX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.83%, less than AUERX's 10.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
AUERX
Auer Growth Fund
10.02%11.39%24.55%4.54%5.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PSBMX
Principal SmallCap Fund
4.83%5.58%3.66%2.91%0.00%7.82%2.28%5.83%16.72%8.65%2.29%3.80%

Frequently Asked Questions


PSBMX and AUERX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PSBMX has higher volatility (5.20%) compared to AUERX (4.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PSBMX dropped -60.15% vs AUERX's -67.23%.

AUERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PSBMX and AUERX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer