PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
PSA.TO vs. MINT
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

PSA.TO vs. MINT

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT).

PSA.TO and MINT are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. PSA.TO is an actively managed fund by Purpose Investments. It was launched on Oct 15, 2013. MINT is an actively managed fund by PIMCO. It was launched on Nov 16, 2009.

Performance

PSA.TO vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

PSA.TO vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund		0.51%2.64%4.56%5.12%2.34%0.60%0.93%2.22%1.65%1.09%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF		2.27%-0.07%15.04%3.91%6.04%-0.94%-0.10%-1.74%10.35%-4.63%
Different Trading Currencies

PSA.TO is traded in CAD, while MINT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the MINT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PSA.TO achieves a 0.51% return, which is significantly lower than MINT's 2.27% return. Over the past 10 years, PSA.TO has underperformed MINT with an annualized return of 2.23%, while MINT has yielded a comparatively higher 3.36% annualized return.

PSA.TO

1D
0.01%
1M
0.18%
YTD
0.51%
6M
1.10%
1Y
2.43%
3Y*
3.88%
5Y*
3.11%
10Y*
2.23%

MINT

1D
0.00%
1M
1.92%
YTD
2.27%
6M
1.84%
1Y
1.62%
3Y*
6.52%
5Y*
5.48%
10Y*
3.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

Purpose High Interest Savings Fund

PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF

Often compared with PSA.TO:
PSA.TO vs. CASH.TOPSA.TO vs. ZMMK.TOPSA.TO vs. HSAV.TOPSA.TO vs. MNY.TOPSA.TO vs. CBIL.TOPSA.TO vs. ZCS.TOPSA.TO vs. TCSH.TO
Often compared with MINT:
MINT vs. EMNTMINT vs. GSYMINT vs. NEARMINT vs. PULSMINT vs. TBILMINT vs. CLOZMINT vs. BND

PSA.TO vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

PSA.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.

MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund

Return for Risk

PSA.TO vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
PSA.TO
PSA.TO Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
PSA.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 100100
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSA.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 100100
Martin Ratio Rank
MINT
MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100100
Overall Rank
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100100
Sortino Ratio Rank
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100100
Omega Ratio Rank
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PSA.TO vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

PSA.TOMINTDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

10.29

0.31

+9.99

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

28.35

0.44

+27.91

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

6.22

1.06

+5.16

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

121.90

0.25

+121.65

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

422.60

0.49

+422.11

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

PSA.TO vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PSA.TO Sharpe Ratio is 10.29, which is higher than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 0.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PSA.TO and MINT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

PSA.TOMINTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.29

0.31

+9.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

11.42

0.86

+10.56

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

9.61

0.49

+9.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

9.23

0.50

+8.73

Correlation

The correlation between PSA.TO and MINT is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

PSA.TO vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

PSA.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.41%, less than MINT's 4.44% yield.

TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PSA.TO
Purpose High Interest Savings Fund		2.41%2.61%4.47%5.05%2.26%0.59%0.94%2.18%1.66%1.07%0.99%1.07%
MINT
PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF		4.44%4.63%5.22%4.91%1.90%0.44%1.15%2.65%2.32%1.61%1.35%0.88%

Drawdowns

PSA.TO vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PSA.TO drawdown since its inception was -0.04%, smaller than the maximum MINT drawdown of -14.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PSA.TO and MINT.

Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators

PSA.TOMINTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.04%

-4.62%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.02%

-0.16%

+0.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-0.04%

-2.42%

+2.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-0.04%

-4.62%

+4.58%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

0.00%

-0.17%

+0.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.01%

0.02%

-0.01%

Volatility

PSA.TO vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Purpose High Interest Savings Fund (PSA.TO) is 0.06%, while PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) has a volatility of 1.36%. This indicates that PSA.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period

PSA.TOMINTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.06%

1.36%

-1.30%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.17%

3.41%

-3.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24%

5.32%

-5.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.27%

6.37%

-6.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.23%

6.84%

-6.61%