PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRZZX vs. FWLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRZZX vs. FWLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund (PRZZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, PRZZX achieves a 4.65% return, which is significantly lower than FWLSX's 12.35% return.


PRZZX

1D
1.40%
1M
-0.33%
6M
4.81%
YTD
4.65%
1Y
10.89%
3Y*
11.79%
5Y*
6.99%
10Y*
8.36%
ALL TIME*
8.88%

FWLSX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.01%
6M
8.41%
YTD
12.35%
1Y
24.74%
3Y*
19.00%
5Y*
10.71%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

PRZZX vs. FWLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRZZX
Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund
4.65%11.23%11.08%20.18%-12.11%12.66%10.18%17.92%-8.50%9.27%
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
12.35%22.76%17.95%21.00%-18.55%16.88%18.48%25.96%-8.33%10.11%

Correlation

The correlation between PRZZX and FWLSX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.95

The correlation between PRZZX and FWLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRZZX vs. FWLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRZZX
PRZZX Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
PRZZX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PRZZX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
PRZZX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
PRZZX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
PRZZX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

FWLSX
FWLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FWLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
FWLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRZZX vs. FWLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund (PRZZX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


PRZZXFWLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.63

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.83

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.30

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

2.42

-1.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.32

10.11

-4.79

PRZZX vs. FWLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current PRZZX Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is lower than the FWLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of PRZZX and FWLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

PRZZX vs. FWLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRZZX drawdown since its inception was -23.93%, smaller than the maximum FWLSX drawdown of -31.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRZZX and FWLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRZZXFWLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.93%

-31.32%

+7.39%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-9.49%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.36%

-15.38%

+0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.08%

-27.40%

+10.32%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.10%

-2.17%

+1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.25%

-5.36%

+2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

2.27%

-0.45%

Volatility

PRZZX vs. FWLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund (PRZZX) is 2.95%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund (FWLSX) has a volatility of 4.39%. This indicates that PRZZX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRZZXFWLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.95%

4.39%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.92%

12.17%

-4.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.78%

14.21%

-4.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.00%

15.36%

-4.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.27%

16.10%

-4.83%

PRZZX vs. FWLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRZZX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is higher than FWLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

PRZZX vs. FWLSX - Dividend Comparison

PRZZX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.83%, less than FWLSX's 4.08% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FWLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2060 Fund
4.08%3.14%7.07%2.36%5.59%9.05%5.80%7.02%8.16%3.09%0.00%0.00%
PRZZX
Putnam RetirementReady 2040 Fund
1.83%1.92%1.69%1.88%14.10%8.92%1.69%5.15%9.81%4.19%0.38%2.24%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, PRZZX and FWLSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FWLSX has higher volatility (4.39%) compared to PRZZX (2.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, PRZZX dropped -23.93% vs FWLSX's -31.32%.

FWLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 0.99), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRZZX and FWLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer