PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRXV vs. LVDS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRXV vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PRXV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LVDS

1D
0.18%
1M
3.85%
YTD
13.56%
6M
14.52%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXV vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRXV and LVDS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026

0.92

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRXV vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRXV vs. LVDS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRXVLVDSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.54

2.39

+2.16

Drawdowns

PRXV vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum LVDS drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and LVDS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRXVLVDSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-6.64%

+5.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-0.98%

+0.66%

Volatility

PRXV vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRXVLVDSDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

10.43%

-0.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.66%

10.43%

-0.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.66%

10.43%

-0.77%

PRXV vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRXV vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison

PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%.


Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, PRXV and LVDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXV.

LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

They also come from different issuers: Praxis and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.30% for LVDS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRXV and LVDS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer