PRXV vs. LVDS
PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) and LVDS (JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. PRXV charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for LVDS.
Performance
PRXV vs. LVDS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRXV
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LVDS
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.85%
- YTD
- 13.56%
- 6M
- 14.52%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRXV vs. LVDS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 4.51% |
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 5.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRXV and LVDS is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRXV vs. LVDS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF (LVDS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| PRXV | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 4.54 | 2.39 | +2.16 |
Drawdowns
PRXV vs. LVDS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum LVDS drawdown of -6.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and LVDS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRXV | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.18% | -6.64% | +5.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.03% | 0.00% | -0.03% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.32% | -0.98% | +0.66% |
Volatility
PRXV vs. LVDS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRXV | LVDS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 9.66% | 10.43% | -0.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 10.43% | -0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.66% | 10.43% | -0.77% |
PRXV vs. LVDS - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than LVDS's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRXV vs. LVDS - Dividend Comparison
PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LVDS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LVDS JPMorgan Fundamental Data Science Large Value ETF | 7.56% | 8.25% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, PRXV and LVDS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, LVDS is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LVDS is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXV.
LVDS has the higher dividend yield at 7.56%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.
They also come from different issuers: Praxis and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.30% for LVDS.
Find the right allocation for PRXV and LVDS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer