PRXV vs. LSVD
PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) and LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRXV charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LSVD.
Performance
PRXV vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
PRXV
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 3.16%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LSVD
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.78%
- 6M
- 14.25%
- YTD
- 17.43%
- 1Y
- 35.15%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PRXV vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 8.29% |
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 8.87% |
Correlation
The correlation between PRXV and LSVD is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026 | 0.56 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
PRXV vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank
PRXV
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
LSVD
PRXV vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| PRXV | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.27 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.93 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
PRXV vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.41%, smaller than the maximum LSVD drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and LSVD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| PRXV | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -1.41% | -19.30% | +17.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -8.07% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.88% | +0.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.38% | -2.49% | +2.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.92% | — |
Volatility
PRXV vs. LSVD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| PRXV | LSVD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.88% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 10.21% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.18% | 13.19% | -3.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.18% | 17.42% | -7.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.18% | 17.42% | -7.24% |
PRXV vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison
PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than LSVD's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
PRXV vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison
PRXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than LSVD's 0.27% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF | 0.27% | 0.32% |
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF | 0.38% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
PRXV and LSVD have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LSVD.
PRXV has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.
They also come from different issuers: Praxis and LSV. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.40% for LSVD.
Find the right allocation for PRXV and LSVD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer