PRXV vs. LSVD

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) and LSVD (LSV Disciplined Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.52 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. PRXV charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for LSVD.

Performance

PRXV vs. LSVD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PRXV

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 0.88%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: —

LSVD

• 1D: 1.00%
• 1M: 2.24%
• 6M: 14.59%
• YTD: 17.97%
• 1Y: 37.10%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 23.42%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	$23.96K	$28.04K	$57.70K
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	$979.94K	$510.04K	$263.55K

PRXV vs. LSVD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	8.89%
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	9.37%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXV and LSVD is 0.52, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 20, 2026	0.52

Return for Risk

PRXV vs. LSVD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

PRXV

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

LSVD

LSVD Risk / Return Rank: 93
LSVD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
LSVD Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LSVD Omega Ratio Rank: 92
LSVD Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
LSVD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

PRXV vs. LSVD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and LSV Disciplined Value ETF (LSVD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	PRXV	LSVD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.61	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.54	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.45	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.37	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	18.02	—

Drawdowns

PRXV vs. LSVD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.41%, smaller than the maximum LSVD drawdown of -19.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and LSVD.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRXV	LSVD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.41%	-19.30%	+17.89%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.07%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.24%	-0.43%	-0.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.39%	-2.46%	+2.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRXV	LSVD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.56%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	10.32%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.08%	13.49%	-3.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	10.08%	17.29%	-7.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.08%	17.29%	-7.21%

PRXV vs. LSVD - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than LSVD's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRXV vs. LSVD - Dividend Comparison

PRXV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%, more than LSVD's 0.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
LSVD LSV Disciplined Value ETF	0.27%	0.32%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	0.38%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRXV and LSVD in my portfolio?

PRXV and LSVD have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRXV or LSVD?

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRXV or LSVD?

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for LSVD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRXV or LSVD?

PRXV has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.27% for LSVD.

What is the main difference between PRXV and LSVD?

They also come from different issuers: Praxis and LSV. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.40% for LSVD.