PRXV vs. BSCQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) and BSCQ (Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - PRXV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Praxis, while BSCQ is a Corporate Bonds fund tracking the NASDAQ BulletShares USD Corporate Bond 2026 Index. PRXV is actively managed, while BSCQ is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.35, they often move in opposite directions. PRXV charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for BSCQ.

Performance

PRXV vs. BSCQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PRXV

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BSCQ

• 1D: 0.08%
• 1M: 0.34%
• YTD: 1.55%
• 6M: 1.92%
• 1Y: 4.41%
• 3Y*: 5.06%
• 5Y*: 1.47%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXV vs. BSCQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	4.51%
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	0.52%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXV and BSCQ is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026	-0.35

Return for Risk

PRXV vs. BSCQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BSCQ

BSCQ Risk / Return Rank: 99
BSCQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Omega Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
BSCQ Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXV vs. BSCQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF (BSCQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRXV	BSCQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	7.06	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.45	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.54	0.60	+3.94

Drawdowns

PRXV vs. BSCQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum BSCQ drawdown of -16.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and BSCQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRXV	BSCQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-16.50%	+15.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.10%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.13%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-13.02%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	0.00%	-0.03%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-2.85%	+2.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.02%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRXV	BSCQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.17%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.43%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.66%	0.63%	+9.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.66%	3.30%	+6.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.66%	4.77%	+4.89%

PRXV vs. BSCQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than BSCQ's 0.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRXV vs. BSCQ - Dividend Comparison

PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BSCQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.12%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
BSCQ Invesco BulletShares 2026 Corporate Bond ETF	4.12%	4.14%	4.05%	3.53%	2.54%	1.91%	2.42%	2.96%	3.32%	2.92%	0.51%
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRXV and BSCQ in my portfolio?

PRXV and BSCQ have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRXV or BSCQ?

On fees, BSCQ is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRXV or BSCQ?

BSCQ is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRXV or BSCQ?

BSCQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.12%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

What is the main difference between PRXV and BSCQ?

PRXV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while BSCQ is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Praxis and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.10% for BSCQ.