PRXV vs. APRP

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

PRXV (Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF) and APRP (PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both exchange-traded funds - PRXV is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by Praxis, while APRP is a Options Trading fund actively managed by PGIM. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. PRXV charges 0.36%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for APRP.

Performance

PRXV vs. APRP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

PRXV

• 1D: -0.03%
• 1M: 4.27%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

APRP

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 1.87%
• YTD: 9.34%
• 6M: 10.32%
• 1Y: 17.90%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXV vs. APRP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
PRXV Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF	4.51%
APRP PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April	2.43%

Correlation

The correlation between PRXV and APRP is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026	0.50

Return for Risk

PRXV vs. APRP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

APRP

APRP Risk / Return Rank: 98
APRP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
APRP Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Omega Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
APRP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXV vs. APRP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and PGIM US Large-Cap Buffer 12 ETF - April (APRP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	PRXV	APRP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	4.15	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.54	1.36	+3.18

Drawdowns

PRXV vs. APRP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, smaller than the maximum APRP drawdown of -13.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and APRP.

Drawdown Indicators

	PRXV	APRP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-1.18%	-13.66%	+12.48%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-1.09%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.03%	-0.19%	+0.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.32%	-1.23%	+0.91%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.24%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	PRXV	APRP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	1.16%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	3.37%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	9.66%	4.33%	+5.33%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.66%	9.49%	+0.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.66%	9.49%	+0.17%

PRXV vs. APRP - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is lower than APRP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

PRXV vs. APRP - Dividend Comparison

Neither PRXV nor APRP has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both PRXV and APRP in my portfolio?

PRXV and APRP have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, PRXV or APRP?

On fees, PRXV is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, PRXV or APRP?

PRXV is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for APRP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, PRXV or APRP?

PRXV and APRP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between PRXV and APRP?

PRXV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while APRP is Options Trading. They also come from different issuers: Praxis and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.50% for APRP.