PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
PRXV vs. ACLO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

PRXV vs. ACLO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


PRXV

1D
-0.03%
1M
4.27%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACLO

1D
0.02%
1M
0.42%
YTD
2.21%
6M
2.58%
1Y
5.31%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

PRXV vs. ACLO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between PRXV and ACLO is -0.35, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 21, 2026

-0.35

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

PRXV vs. ACLO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

PRXV

ACLO
ACLO Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
ACLO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACLO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACLO Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
ACLO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACLO Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

PRXV vs. ACLO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF (PRXV) and TCW AAA CLO ETF (ACLO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

PRXV vs. ACLO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


PRXVACLODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

4.54

5.10

-0.56

Drawdowns

PRXV vs. ACLO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum PRXV drawdown since its inception was -1.18%, which is greater than ACLO's maximum drawdown of -1.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for PRXV and ACLO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


PRXVACLODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.18%

-1.01%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

0.00%

-0.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.32%

-0.05%

-0.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.03%

Volatility

PRXV vs. ACLO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


PRXVACLODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.66%

0.73%

+8.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.66%

1.08%

+8.58%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.66%

1.08%

+8.58%

PRXV vs. ACLO - Expense Ratio Comparison

PRXV has a 0.36% expense ratio, which is higher than ACLO's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

PRXV vs. ACLO - Dividend Comparison

PRXV has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ACLO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%.


PositionTTM20252024
ACLO
TCW AAA CLO ETF
4.91%4.87%0.59%
PRXV
Praxis Impact Large Cap Value ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


PRXV and ACLO have a correlation of -0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACLO is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACLO is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for PRXV.

ACLO has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.00% for PRXV.

PRXV is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while ACLO is CLO. They also come from different issuers: Praxis and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.36% for PRXV and 0.20% for ACLO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for PRXV and ACLO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer